Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 381 - 400
of 4,718
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2023, 1:05 pm
Edward T. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 11:41 am
And despite Brexit, I don’t think there’s any plans to change that. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 6:33 pm
It is important, though, to keep in mind that those policy choices that produce long lines, scarcity, and infrastructure inefficiencies may be as important to the stability of the current government as it contributes to the protection of its theoretical and operational core (and thus the position and prerogatives of those with a hand in managing the state). [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 12:18 pm
I’m so interested in the technology and contract law issues that arise from NFTs that I had to share them with you all.Before diving headfirst into this topic, I do want to set up some foundational NFT knowledge so that those of you who are less up-to-date on NFTs can still follow along and we can make sure we’re all on the same page when discussing the legal issues. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 4:06 am
The relevant consumers consist of the public at large.The Board observed that "[t]o determine if a mark is generic, we examine the evidence up through the time of trial. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:51 am
A good selection is an up-close selfie that showcases natural features while a bad selection is a distanced pose, or a group photo. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
In response to all this fear, the Internet exploded – delete your period tracker; use encrypted apps; don’t take a pregnancy test. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am
Internet and Social Media The Clean Up the Internet blog has published its reflections on the UK’s online safety agenda in 2022. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 10:23 pm
The key messages are that Activision Blizzard employees will benefit from the acquisition with a view to unionization, and that "it’s important to explore solutions that protect competition and consumers while also promoting the needs of workers, economic growth and American innovation. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:58 am
In Skinner v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 5:20 am
Consumer Reviews * Xu v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 1:47 pm
In addition, SPAC mergers are no longer attracting the sky-high valuations that sometimes prevailed in 2020 and 2021 and that in at least some instances set some companies up for later sharp declines. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 6:38 pm
That was cleared up but not to everyone's satisfaction. 2020 proved to be a more difficult year. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 10:32 am
If you are convicted of second-degree murder, you are ineligible for parole for at least 10 years but up to 25 years. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Could law and policy keep up with emerging technologies? [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 12:19 pm
Cristostomo v. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 6:50 pm
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
Additionally, the Family Court properly included the children as protected persons on the order of protection, as the evidence demonstrated that doing so was “necessary to further the purposes of protection” (Family Ct Act § 842[l]; see Matter of Lengiewicz v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 7:55 am
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 7:55 am
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
