Search for: "T. K."
Results 381 - 400
of 20,584
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
In this case Board 3.3.08 confirmed decision T 146/07 where anonymous third party observations had been found not to be admissible.[1.6] Anonymous, unsigned third party observations were filed during the appeal proceedings.[1.7] In decision T 146/09 (sic), this board, in a different composition, held that the identification of a third party in the context of third party submissions in opposition proceedings was particularly important in order to allow the competent organ of the EPO… [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
It is also a general principle that such applications must be treated as favourably as those made in a contracting state (see T 700/05 [4.1.1], also T 353/03). [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 6:23 am
” At the moment, we are focusing on the rules that cover non-financial statement corporate disclosures, otherwise known as Regulation S-K. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
It's time for another edition of "Fact or Fiction" a/k/a "Quick Answers to Quick Questions" a/k/a QATQQ f/k/a "I don't feel like writing a long blog post". [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 12:54 pm
That means that you suspended contributions under a safe harbor 401(k) plan, you can’t resume a safe harbor matching contribution midyear. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:26 pm
The government acting as K-12 educator (i.e., kindergarten through 12th grade) may restrict speech if ita. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:41 am
A 401(k) plan's terms also may let individuals take a hardship withdrawal that doesn't have to be repaid if the borrower demonstrates a financial need such as medical or funeral expenses. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
Hence, the board concludes that the requirements of R 99(1)(a) are met and thereby follows the jurisprudence established in decisions T 920/97 [1], T 475/07 [1.1] and T 1519/08 [2.1]). [2.2.3] Moreover, the board does not agree that the appeal proceedings should be stayed in view of decision T 445/08, pending as referral G 1/12. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm
The opponent also argued that the main request should not be admitted into the proceedings pursuant to Article 12(4) RPBA and in line with decisions T 144/09 and T 936/09. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
It enjoyed priority only from the third priority document which disclosed the correct sequence (see T 923/92 [3-17]). [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 3:44 am
Türkiye’de alternatif uyu? [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 5:22 pm
My fiction quota (true, not very large) is taken up at the moment with The New American Library's recent release of Philip K. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
As a result, the previous agreement of the appellant with that earlier text was conclusively withdrawn.The fact that the ED did not agree to the last amendment of claim 1 of the main request as filed with the appellant’s letter of 23 November 2011 but held it to be inadmissible for various procedural and substantive reasons (as set out both in its communication of 25/30 November 2011 and in the addendum to the decision under appeal) could not and did not “revive” or… [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
It submitted that in decision T 1092/01 [14] the present board noted that it was the information content of any prior art document that was critical, and not what might inherently have occurred if a method described in the prior art had been carried out. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm
T 197/86).As we shall see in the present decision, this does not mean that minor differences in the experimental conditions cannot be accepted, especially when the effect obtained is considerable.The patent proprietor filed an appeal after the Opposition Division had revoked its patent. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
The Board refused this request[11] [… T]he Board could not allow the appellant’s request for postponement of the oral proceedings. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 10:07 am
If you qualify, you won’t pay penalty taxes, but the withdrawals will affect your income tax bracket.[1] If you are in the midst of a divorce or if you plan on filing for divorce soon, taking money from your 401(k) can also have huge consequences for you in the future. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
In the present case it was only contested that the group of surfactants of formula R-(O-CH2-CH2)k-OH, where k = 4 and R represents 8 carbon atoms, was disclosed in document D1.[5.2.1] The only relevant passage concerning the group of surfactants is found in column 3, lines 44 to 47. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
A loss is “passive” if you don’t “materially participate” in the business. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 3:55 am
Recently, Morningstar announced that it’s “retiring” 10-K Wizard – and it looks like ThomsonReuters could be shutting down LivEdgar (aka “Business Law Research”) soon too. [read post]
