Search for: "THE FIRST INSURANCE CO., LTD." Results 381 - 400 of 871
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am by David Fraser
As found by the Federal Court in  State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 9:48 pm by Stephen Page
What potential other solutions are there, no matter how wacky they might be at first glance? [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  In 2015, the New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division – First Department, was faced with two matters, both of which addressed whether bonds issued to entities formed for the purposes of investing and trading in securities, covered losses the entities sustained by investing in Madoff’s Ponzi scheme.[7]  In 2009, Madoff pleaded guilty to 11 federal felonies and was sentenced to 150 years in prison, the maximum allowed. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 4:21 am by Will Holder, Olswang LLP
The first, second and third respondents were insurers who subsequently paid out under insurance policies with Sony and the owner of the warehouse. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Taylor, 782 F.3d 1142 (10th Cir. 2015); In re Merck & Co., Inc. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 5:23 pm by Goldfinger Personal Injury Law
The imbalance of power and knowledge between a first time, injured, disabled, LTD claimant vs. a sophisticated insurer is remarkable. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
However, interest in purchasing this type of insurance did not develop until 1939, when in New York Dock Co. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 7:52 am by Matrix Legal Su
The Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime v Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd & Ors, heard 21 January 2016. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 8:33 am by Alisha Parmar
Canadian Northern Shield Insurance Co., (1993), 76 BCLR (2d) 231 (CA) [5]Ibid at para. 17, citing Kropp v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:41 am by MBettman
Insurance Co., 40 Ohio St. 517 (1884) (Where there is a debt secured by a mortgage, “separate actions may therefore be maintained, one to foreclose and the other for a personal judgment . . . [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 1:03 am by INFORRM
Hayes, denied calling Mitchell the names and sued security company Vision Security Group Ltd. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 7:04 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
A customer uses an Apple Inc. iPhone to pay via the Apple Pay system, from their American Express Co., account, at the check-out till inside a Pret A Manger Ltd store in this arranged photograph in London, U.K., on Tuesday, July 14, 2015. [read post]
  In these joined cases, the Court took the opportunity to re-write the penalties doctrine, which had not been considered by the House of Lords or Supreme Court since the 1914 case of Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd [1914] UKHL 1. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 3:52 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This was the first time the Privy Council and the Supreme Court had ever sat together to hear an appeal. [read post]