Search for: "THOMAS v. US GOVERNMENT"
Results 381 - 400
of 5,534
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2013, 2:08 pm
When the government uses a racial classification, the courts will apply the "strict scrutiny" test to determine whether that use is consistent with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:17 am
They also cite Sosa v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 10:54 am
One of the drafters of the US Constitution, Thomas Jefferson, suggested that every generation of Americans should draft its own version to meet the particularities of its time. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 7:01 pm
Thomas H. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 4:35 pm
And Justice Clarence Thomas evoked Homer Plessy, the plaintiff in the landmark 1896 decision Plessy v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 12:59 pm
Thus, it suggested that the Justices hold the Thomas More case pending the outcome of the government case. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 6:45 am
”In its 2019 Bucklew v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am
United States, in which the Court made it harder for the federal government to use the fact of a prior criminal conviction to increase a criminal sentence; American Express Co. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
According to the Brief, "union and government pension funds are the most activist shareholders and would impose costs by, among other things, using Rule 14a-11 as leverage to obtain concessions from the company not related to shareholder value. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 6:33 am
Martin v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 3:59 pm
In this blog post, attorney Thomas B. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 2:00 pm
Co. v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 12:35 am
In Murray v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 7:47 am
See US v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 3:00 pm
Supreme Court issued a rare unanimous ruling in Timbs v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 9:20 am
By Thomas Kaufman and Travis Anderson On December 13, 2011, the Ninth Circuit issued its most recent decision in the Sullivan v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 2:38 pm
Salinas v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 7:08 pm
At least that is how it looked after the music industry filed a joint reply with the government as part of the triennial of the effectiveness of the DMCA. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 12:51 pm
The Court thus likewise had to consider whether private religious speech on government property or using government funding violated this no-endorsement principle. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 3:18 pm
The constitutional analysis in the Supreme Court's decision yesterday in Matal v. [read post]
