Search for: "TOTAL SITE DEVELOPMENT, INC." Results 381 - 400 of 662
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2012, 8:29 am by Roy Ginsburg
  Just last July PhoneDog.com, a popular mobile phone site, sued in federal district court in California a former employee who had amassed approximately 17,000 followers on Twitter claiming that the followers constituted a company-owned customer list entitling it to $2.50 per month per follower or $350,000 in total damages. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:50 pm by Robert Milligan
By Robert Milligan and Joshua Salinas We have compiled a list of the top 2011 developments/headlines in trade secret, computer fraud, and non-compete law. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Fundamental Law for Journalists Author: Mark Bourrie Publisher: Irwin Law Inc. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:16 pm
Hobby Lobby, Inc., 723 F. 3d 1114 (10th Cir., 2013) provides one of the most interesting applications of the insights we try to draw in the book. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 6:01 am by Kit Case
Not developing an emergency response plan to address a possible ethanol fuel spill, $63,000. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 11:15 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
" The 14 IHVD grant recipient organizations include: Altravax Inc. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:22 am by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
In addition to summarizing these appeals, Koenig also includes developments from the DBA. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
A version of this article previously was published on ABA’s Business Law Today site (here). [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 4:46 pm
 After an additional award of $63,600 for attorney’s fees, plus the $3,052,339 in gross revenues, the award totaled $88,594,539.00. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 1:33 pm by WIMS
Access EPA's environmental monitoring site (click here). [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 2:29 pm by Keith Szeliga and Emily Theriault
For example, a union agreement that provided for higher wage rates for construction work on hazardous sites would not be discriminatory against the Government if the Government paid higher rates for work performed on a hazardous Government site. [read post]