Search for: "The Active v. United States"
Results 381 - 400
of 18,172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2011, 1:37 pm
United States, 91 Fed. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 11:30 am
This is an unusual discussion, so I will quote it in full: Congress has provided that “[i]t is the policy of the United States … to preserve the vibrant and competitive free market that presently exists for the Internet and other interactive computer services, unfettered by Federal or State Regulation …. [read post]
2 May 2012, 4:00 am
United States placed non-publicly traded stock within a revocable trust. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 4:48 pm
(18-1059) (Preview of United States... [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 6:56 pm
-- concluding that agency performed adequate search for records concerning activities of Assistant United States Attorney with respect to plaintiff, a pro se inmate.Summaries of all opinions issued since April 2015 available here. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 5:46 am
President of the United States (3d Cir. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:25 am
For the second time in three months, a judge in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania has allowed a claim to go forward on whether hydraulic fracturing – or “fracking” – activities can be the basis for a strict liability claim. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 7:40 am
New Forestry, LLC, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania held that an oil and gas lessee did not have an implied right to use the leasehold property for activities related to the injection of waste water from its regional drilling [...] [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 1:16 pm
In a 5-4 decision, the United States Supreme Court held state agencies are not immune from claims brought under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) in the case Torres v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 12:21 am
In the new case, United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
” The Court stated that when judges do take an active role in questioning witnesses, they must use care and not create the impression that they have adopted a position on the facts, issues or credibility. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 11:18 am
The plaintiff argued, and the Ninth Circuit (en banc) held, that an exception to immunity applied because the action against OBB was “based upon a commercial activity carried on in the United States” – namely the sale of the ticket to Sachs in the United States. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 12:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 1:23 pm
Sturgeon and Alaska contended that the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA) precludes NPS from regulating activities on state-owned lands and navigable waters that fall within the boundaries of National Park System units in Alaska. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 11:03 am
The application for the FISC order was personally approved by John Ashcroft, then the Attorney General of the United States. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 10:25 am
United States, 135 S. [read post]
7 May 2012, 2:09 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 10:34 am
See United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 8:55 am
” Further, legal analysis can be classified because it “clearly would ‘pertain to’ an intelligence activity, intelligence source or method, or foreign activity. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 6:38 am
United States v. [read post]
