Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Brooks"
Results 381 - 400
of 666
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:51 am
Lewitton v. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 11:57 pm
Brooks, B. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Brooks, No. 05-4602, 05-4603, 05-4604, 05-4605, 05-4616 In a drug related prosecution, judgment is vacated and remanded in part where the court erred in declining a request that it give instructions requiring the jury to make an essential threshold determination of drug quantity and establish the penalty range for each individual conspiracy defendant, which resulted in a defendant receiving a sentence in excess of the maximum established by section 841(b)(1)(c). [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:17 am
Brooks (Docket Report) District Court E D Virginia: Nine year delay does not trigger laches but does preclude award of prejudgment interest: Humanscale Corp. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2019, 4:56 am
Bostock v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:40 am
Resolved cases include: A woman v The People, Clause 1, 3, 6, 07/06/2012; Mr David Wieberg v The Guardian, Clause 1, 06/06/2012; Mary Reid v Daily Record, Clause 1, 01/06/2012; A woman v Kent & Sussex Courier, Clauses 1, 5, 6 31/05/2012; Adam Wood v Yorkshire Evening Post, Clause 1, 30/05/2012; Ms Belinda Cunnison v Berwickshire News, Clause 1, 30/05/2012; Mr Ronald Baird v Daventry Express, Clause 1, 30/05/2012; Ms Helen… [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
Journalism and the PCC There are no adjudicated PCC rulings to report, but several “resolved” cases including: Miss Catherine Lemon v Western Daily Press (Clause 1, 20/01/2012); A woman v The People (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); A woman v Daily Mail (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Ayr Advertiser (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Sunday Mail (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Dr Esther Hobson v The Star… [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Decision to Overturn Roe v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 2:19 pm
Chapin, 299 AD2d 294; Kent v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 5:52 pm
Regardless of the outcome of the trial, it could set off a flurry of appeals that could ultimately land the case before the Supreme Court, where multiple justices have called for a reexamination of New York Times v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 6:46 am
This case may be related to another DME health care fraud case, U.S. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2021, 10:30 am
It made the richest people in the world central — almost too central — figures in our lives. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 6:56 pm
First, we heard closing args in the Fairbairn v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 1:26 pm
To codify administrative detention would be to perpetuate a system that has to date incarcerated more innocent people than it has men of violence on the basis of half-truths and innuendo. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 12:03 pm
Covinsky v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 4:29 am
NorAm Drilling Co. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 2:25 pm
Cooper and Juliette V. [read post]
