Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Glass"
Results 381 - 400
of 865
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2014, 11:54 am
These young people and their new blogs! [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:30 am
All Mapp v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 7:45 am
Increasingly large numbers of people carry such devices with them everywhere they go (be they cell phones, mobile computers, smart watches, smart glasses, or tablets). [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:06 am
SSWP v David Nelson and Fife Council, SSWP v James Nelson and Fife Council [2014] UKUT 0525 (AAC) And the upshot? [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 9:47 am
State v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 4:00 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
”[4] As such, it not only bans any onsite advertisement outside a firearms dealer’s premises informing potential customers that it sells handguns, it bans any in-store advertisement (or firearms display) that can be seen through a glass door or window. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 12:53 pm
In later installments, I have discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
Supreme Court dismisses appeal in Servier v Apotex. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 8:47 am
The judge's basic position was that the test was what the judge could see with his own eyes, rather than focusing on a close verbal analysis of the glasses' respective features.The next case under analysis was the CJEU ruling in Karen Millen v Dunnes Stores [noted by the IPKat here]. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 8:14 am
Additional Resources:Cheeks v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:45 am
” Alvi’s Drift Wine International v. von Stiehl Winery, Cancellation No. 92058100 (September 12, 2014) [not precedential]. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 9:45 am
Cf. 4thcircuit’s AOL v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
In the case of Maeker v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 1:27 pm
At that time, the People filed a supporting deposition signed by Officer KK, which identified the contraband seized as a glass pipe containing crack cocaine residue. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 3:11 am
Rather, a multi-stage thought process would be necessary: 1) respondent’s wine has a higher alcohol content; 2) drinking fortified wine may make one inebriated; 3) inebriated people act inappropriately; 4) people who act inappropriately may be considered naughty; 5) NAUGHTY GIRL describes the result on the drinker of using the wine. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
But she met her glass ceiling when she, an unmarried woman, announced her pregnancy in 2013. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 5:40 am
In fact, it almost seems, well, a little disturbing to remind people in misery that we’re having a good, no, a great, time. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:26 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 7:27 am
Here’s the introduction: In June 2014, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Riley v. [read post]
