Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Morgan" Results 381 - 400 of 704
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2014, 6:59 am
Professor Barnett builds his radically individualistic view of popular sovereignty on Chisholm v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:56 pm by Gene Killian
Morgan, for example, has just paid $218 million to settle class-action litigation relating to the Madoff mess. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Last Tuesday, March 4, 2014, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Duran v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 11:03 am by John Hopkins
Morgan Stanley (2005WL 679071) case and the missteps of the Zubulake v UBS Warburg [220 F.R.D. 212 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)} case, I am satisfied we have moved well beyond the Micron vs. [read post]
We here at the ACLU are litigating Adkins v .Morgan Stanley, a case that seeks to remedy damages inflicted on African-American homeowners in the Detroit area who were harmed by a predatory and discriminatory mortgage securitization machine that left them with extremely risky, foreclosure-prone loans. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 8:06 pm by Walter Olson
Deval Patrick, CNN host Piers Morgan apologize to townspeople of Lunenburg, Mass.? [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 4:04 am by Dave
 Judge Mark effectively distinguished R v Coventry CC ex p Morgan, QBD, 07.07.1995 (in which Collins J held that public sector accommodation was not an appropriate comparator for private sector rents) by restricting the ambit of that case to comparing like with like “so far as practicable” ([28]) or “so far as reasonably possible” ([32]). [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 4:04 am by Dave
 Judge Mark effectively distinguished R v Coventry CC ex p Morgan, QBD, 07.07.1995 (in which Collins J held that public sector accommodation was not an appropriate comparator for private sector rents) by restricting the ambit of that case to comparing like with like “so far as practicable” ([28]) or “so far as reasonably possible” ([32]). [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The judge said that it was “of regret when people in public office comment about a person who is involved in a trial which is in progress”. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 9:38 pm by Buce
 Cute if unkind, but it's worth reflecting on when we consider Mandela v., oh well, almost anybody else in Africa. [read post]