Search for: "The People v. Cross"
Results 381 - 400
of 6,116
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2011, 3:16 am
We note, however, that such questions were improper (see People v Paul, 229 AD2d 932; People v Paul, 212 AD2d 1020, 1021, lv denied 85 NY2d 912; People v Edwards, 167 AD2d 864, lv denied 77 NY2d 877). [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 6:25 am
Ms Heard was cross-examined by Ms Eleanor Laws QC for Mr Depp. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 7:27 am
The provisional model jury instructions set forth in Commonwealth v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 9:09 pm
:We also find reversible error in the trial court's almost continuous interference, during cross examination of the People's witnesses, in defense counsel's exploration of issues relevant to defendant's intent to sell (see People v Canto, 31 AD3d 312 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 900 [2006]; People v Melendez, 31 AD3d 186 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 927 [2006]; People v Retamozzo, 25 AD3d 73 [2005]; People… [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
In Dred Scott v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:06 am
While several witnesses testified that the defendant was at the scene, on cross examination, the witness statements were not consistent. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 7:37 am
In Wal-Mart v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 6:53 pm
Golb (N.Y. 2014) and People v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 4:10 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 8:08 am
Paul Luvera provides a good "cost v. benefits" sample cross examination. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 8:08 am
Paul Luvera provides a good "cost v. benefits" sample cross examination. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 3:34 pm
Some years back they made quite a bit of law in a case called State Farm v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 2:45 pm
We have a fully briefed summary judgment motion on the First Amendment and the government cross-moved to dismiss the case. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 10:35 am
I told you he meant the people outside. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 6:13 am
Officers came to defendant's house for a knock-and-talk, and they saw people fleeing and smelled marijuana. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:02 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Yesterday, the Tenth Circuit voted 5–4 not to rehear the Utah roadside cross memorial case, American Atheists, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:47 pm
In People v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:55 am
Many people believe that crossing state lines is what determines whether conduct can result in federal criminal charges. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 12:45 pm
CFPs:Forced Migration Review [info]- Articles sought for a theme issue on "Afghanistan’s Displaced People: 2014 and Beyond." [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 5:29 pm
Patrick notes: In Hogan-Cross v. [read post]