Search for: "The Travelers v. Mays" Results 381 - 400 of 9,109
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2023, 5:55 am by Mark Nevitt
The OLC wrote in October 2022 that “the DoD may lawfully expend funds to pay for service members and their dependents to travel to obtain abortions that DoD cannot itself perform due to statutory restrictions. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 8:25 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Spouse and minor children can also avail of work authorization and travel permission after they file their I-485 applications. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
It defines Scope 3 emissions as “indirect upstream and downstream greenhouse gas emissions, other than scope 2 emissions, from sources that the reporting entity does not own or directly control and may include, but are not limited to, purchased goods and services, business travel, employee commutes, and processing and use of sold products. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 3:13 am by Cari Rincker
(June 1, 2020), https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2020/06/01/570571.htm. [2] BJ’s Wholesale Club Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 7:37 am by Phil Dixon
No Bivens remedy against BOP officials for alleged First Amendment, procedural due process, or race-based discrimination violations Mays v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Like Mallory, disgruntled current or former employees, plan members, or other opposing parties in disputes may choose to file their lawsuit in the state with the laws, rules, or precedent most favorable to their position even where the dispute does not arise out of events occurring in the chosen state. [read post]