Search for: "Thomas v. Price*" Results 381 - 400 of 1,322
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am by Ronald Collins
Then there are quasi-biographies such as those by Thomas Healy (2013, pp. 336) and Brad Snyder (2017, pp. 824). [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Pharmaceutical Pricing Jaime King, University of California Hastings College of the Law, The Burden of Federalism: Challenges to State Attempts at Controlling Prescription Drug Costs Marc Rodwin, Suffolk University Law School, Controlling Pharmaceutical Prices: What the U.S. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am by John Elwood
Remember United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
  Judgment was reserved. .United States There has been widespread reporting of Thomas J’s concurring opinion [pdf] in the case of McKee v Cosby to the effect that the US Supreme Court should reconsider New York Times v Sullivan. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:40 am by John Elwood
And Justice Clarence Thomas filed an opinion calling on the court to reconsider its defamation jurisprudence in a case that had been rescheduled 12 times – so often that it was one of the rare non-relisted cases I discussed this term. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by John Elwood
We’ll see whether this becomes the first gun-rights case the court takes up in many years or whether the Second Amendment remains (in Justice Clarence Thomas’ words) “a disfavored right in this Court. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 10:30 am by Mark Walsh
The other is that the second case for argument today is Lorenzo v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
As Thomas Bateman (Reading 11.6) shows, even before he became Prime Minister, there were signs that Harper’s relationship with the courts would be different than his predecessors. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 9:05 am by Jack Sharman
Two that come to mind, for example, are Evan Thomas’s The Man To See (1992) (about Edward Bennett Williams) and Louis Nizer’s  My Life In Court (1961). [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog has covered the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1780. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am by msatta
Those decisions—including one by then-Judge Clarence Thomas—were by judges who are as skeptical of antitrust as Judge Kavanaugh does, and they grossly exaggerated the actual holdings and language of the Supreme Court opinions. [read post]