Search for: "Tomlinson v. Tomlinson"
Results 381 - 400
of 533
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm
We have had previous posts on the cases of Robins v Kordowski [2011] EWHC 981 (QB)) (seehere), Awdry, Bailey and Douglas v Kordowksi, Farrall v Kordowksi [2010] EWHC 2436 (QB) (see here), Phillips v Kordowski and Mazzola v Kordowski. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:48 am
The trial in the case of El-Naschie v Macmillan finally began on 11 November 2011. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
Judgment was reserved by the Court of Appeal in Cambridge v Makin on Thursday 3 November 2011, the Court of Appeal (Hughes, Black and Tomlinson LJJ). [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 8:36 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:30 am
On Wednesday 2 or Thursday 3 November 2011, the Court of Appeal (Hughes, Black and Tomlinson LJJ) will hear the appeal in the case of Cambridge v Makin. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:02 am
Today the Committee will have two sessions: in the first, at 2.40pm, the witnesses will be David Price QC, Gavin Millar QC, Keith Mathieson and Gillian Phillips; and in the second, at 3.40pm, Hugh Tomlinson QC, Gideon Benaim and Alasdair Pepper. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 6:21 am
The Top Ten posts for the last quarter have been Harassment and injunctions: Cheryl Cole – Natalie Peck News: Hemming MP’s “super injunction victim” named as sex abuse fabricator Case Law: Thornton v Telegraph Media Group, an offer of amends defence fails – Hugh Tomlinson QC The Trafigura Story: who guards the Guardian? [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 3:44 am
In the case of Harrison & ANOR v Black Horse [2011] EWCA Civ 1128 it was held that a lender's failure to disclose to borrowers that it received commission for selling them payment protection insurance did not amount to unfairness under s.140A and s.140B Consumer Credit Act 1974 (the Act).The borrowers were told that the Payment Protection Plan premium was £10,200. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am
It is said that it should have applied the approach in Galloway v Telegraph ([2006] EWCA Civ 17) and should only have overturned the judge’s decision on balancing conflicting Convention rights if it was “plainly wrong”. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
It has been forcefully argued that the decision of the Court of Appeal is inconsistent with the decision of the House of Lords in Jameel v Wall Street Journal ([2007] 1 AC 359). [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
It is said that it should have applied the approach in Galloway v Telegraph ([2006] EWCA Civ 17) and should only have overturned the judge’s decision on balancing conflicting Convention rights if it was “plainly wrong”. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:37 pm
Another, more radical option is that which has been persuasively proposed by Hugh Tomlinson QC on this blog. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 12:18 am
In Palomo Sànchez v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 5:02 pm
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Ferdinand v MGN, heard 4 to 6 July 2011 (Nicol J) WXY v Gewanter, heard 11-15, 18-19 July 2011 (Slade J) Commissioner of Police v Times Newspapers, heard 18-20 & 22 July 2011 (Tugendhat J) Morrison v Buckinghamshire CC, heard 20 to 21 July (HHJ Parkes QC) [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 12:45 am
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Ferdinand v MGN, heard 4 to 6 July 2011 (Nicol J) WXY v Gewanter, heard 11-15, 18-19 July 2011 (Slade J) Commissioner of Police v Times Newspapers, heard 18-20 & 22 July 2011 (Tugendhat J) Morrison v Buckinghamshire CC, heard 20 to 21 July (HHJ Parkes QC) Share this:PrintEmailTwitterFacebookLike this:Be the first to like this post. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 12:22 am
In the courts: Mr Yiannis Voyias v Information Commissioner, Camden Council must disclose list of empty residential properties to squatting campaigner under FoI rules, says first tier tribunal. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 11:57 pm
The same principle was again approved by the Court in Severn Trent Water v Barnes, and followed by Lady Justice Arden in this case. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 12:14 am
In the case of Glik v Cunniffe (26 August 2011) the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that there is a First Amendment right to record police activity in public. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 5:02 pm
In the case of Glik v Cunniffe (26 August 2011) the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that there is a First Amendment right to record police activity in public. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 5:15 pm
The Fourthy Section case of Aquilina and Others v. [read post]
