Search for: "U. S. of America, Appeal of" Results 381 - 400 of 525
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Let’s, you know, let’s try to work it out. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 11:57 am
  Restoring habeas corpus would help repair the damage and demonstrate America's commitment to a tough, but rights-respecting counter-terrorism policy. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Ken White
Court of Appeals in the case of O’Brien v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 6:07 pm
"[12] The Official "One in Four" Figure "One in four" has since become the official figure on women's rape victimization cited in women's studies departments, rape crisis centers, women's magazines, and on protest buttons and posters. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Boxer Floyd Mayweather’s ex-fiancee’s defamation claim against him has been dismissed by a California appeals court. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 11:36 pm by Marie Louise
Cleopatra (Class 46)   Portugal INPI – New fees for trade mark related acts (Class 46)   Uganda Uganda High Court considers when trade mark infringement & passing off actions prescribe: Vitafoam (U) Ltd. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 7:33 pm by Dennis Crouch
Chakrabarty, 447 U. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 10:22 am by John Elwood
Thanks to Bryan U. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 8:22 am by Jeff Gamso
 As happens, the case was appealed and the Ohio Supreme Court affirmed the conviction and death sentence. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit’s so-called “provocation doctrine. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm by axd10
Executed on a technicality lethal injustice on America's death row. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
An appeal followed later in the year. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Appeal Judgement (ICTY 2004), Judge Mohamed Shahabuddeen (right) advocated a different understanding of the word “destroy”. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 6:24 am by Eugene Volokh
Here's the rest of Part I. [* * *] Let's now turn to some other areas beyond pseudonymity of litigants. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 5:08 am by Marty Lederman
  Those briefs frame the issue in a particular, familiar way:  They assume that the Court’s decision depends upon whether it would violate Title VII for an employer to implement a policy that categorically excludes all persons with same-sex orientation, gay men and lesbians alike, from the workforce—as though the cases involve what a couple of court of appeals judges (Judge Lynch in the Second Circuit and Judge Sykes in the Seventh… [read post]