Search for: "U.S. v. Concepcion" Results 381 - 400 of 833
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2012, 12:35 pm by Dan Markel
(with the Pronouncing Dictionaryspreadsheet) From the Bag Marshall’s Maps, the U.S. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 3:30 am by Andrew Trask
National Australia Bank Ltd., which held that a securities plaintiff with no connection to the United States may not avail itself of the U.S. court system; and Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 10:31 am
Concepcion, 563 U.S. __ (2011), and held that state law decisions that find class action waivers in arbitration clauses to be unconscionable or void as against public policy were preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 9:31 pm by Steven G. Pearl
Concepcion (2011) ___ U.S. ___, 131 S.Ct. 1740, 179 L.Ed.2d 742 (discussed here) does not prevent courts from rejecting arbitration agreements that they find unconscionable. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  The Supreme Court may have lost interest in taking up additional post-Concepcion cases, now that it has granted review in Sanchez v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 8:30 am by Steven G. Pearl
Concepcion, ___ U.S. ___, 131 S.Ct. 1740, 179 L.Ed.2d 742 (2011), the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA" or "Act") preempts California's state law rule prohibiting the arbitration of claims for broad, public injunctive relief—a rule established in Broughton v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:06 pm by Steven G. Pearl
Concepcion (2011) 563 U.S. ---, do not prevent it from analyzing the arbitration agreement for unconscionability. [read post]