Search for: "U.S. v. Penta*"
Results 381 - 400
of 726
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2013, 6:34 pm
More recently, in the 2008 military commission case of U.S. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 2:54 pm
Technically, the filing in Ajam v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:00 pm
His successor, James Clapper, said in 2011 that while terrorism “will remain at the forefront of our national security threats,” al-Qaeda “continues to be damaged” by U.S. counterterrorism efforts. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
Over the past two-and-a-half years, we have published over a hundred posts on the NDAAs and related legal developments, including the Southern District of New York’s important decision in Hedges v. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 5:30 am
Ohio bans those dangerous dens of iniquity, Internet cafes http://t.co/9cdYk7vMWf -> Apple likely guilty of e-book conspiracy, judge says days before trial http://t.co/zGJgScxk2c -> Blogged, Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2013-05-26 – http://t.co/0UAHuHUeLE -> Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2013-05-26 http://t.co/tpUmEOeM8d -> UK Court of Appeal Limits Compensation Owed by Businesses which Breach Privacy Laws http://t.co/nimYnMJSTW -> Computer and… [read post]
29 May 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/lSu3tO9CkA -> Google says Java APIs lost copyrightability like Aspirin lost trademark protection over time http://t.co/G3o1IubgdK -> The Federal Circuit has set the stage for granting Apple an injunction against Samsung http://t.co/JjwIib4Db3 -> Protecting IP Rights http://t.co/3QglFXeUGW -> Dennis Blair and Jon Huntsman: Protect U.S. intellectual property rights http://t.co/2DEVYShVvW -> Google Reader Woes Update http://t.co/ebVryYkYFs -> Tech Law Summit 2013… [read post]
10 May 2013, 4:34 pm
Several news organizations are reporting today that the U.S. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 3:43 pm
In a statement filed in U.S. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:35 am
Apr 3: In the U.S. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
Here are three permutations, though there are more: First, a court to review and approve all targeted lethal force by the U.S. government away from any so-called “hot battlefield,” against a terrorist, including in the course of a congressionally-authorized armed conflict conducted by the U.S. military; Second, a court to review and approve targeted lethal force by the U.S. government away from the “hot battlefield,” but only against a terrorist who… [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:50 am
Tenet, who oversaw the brutal interrogations, and Michael V. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 9:03 pm
(A copy of the panel’s decision in Hamdan v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 9:04 am
In dismissing Klay v Panetta, a civil lawsuit that Klay brought against the Pentagon for failing to protect her and other service members from sexual violence, U.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:21 pm
More on Clapper v. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 5:12 am
” Now Senator Paul has followed up in a letter that asks Brennan: “Do you believe that the President has the authority to order lethal force, such as a drone strike, against a U.S. citizen on U.S. soil, and without a trial? [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
Two months later, U.S. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 1:24 pm
United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971) (refusing to stop the publication of classified documents about U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War); Florida Star v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 1:24 pm
United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971) (refusing to stop the publication of classified documents about U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War); Florida Star v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:27 am
The TTSCA is Congress’ answer to a Second Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 4:25 am
United Kingdom and Al-Skeini v. [read post]
