Search for: "U.S. v. Strickland"
Results 381 - 400
of 562
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm
U.S. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 11:46 am
Texas, which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Strickland Northern District of Ohio at ClevelandSUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:05 pm
Kulbicki 14-848Issue: Whether an appellate court violates the core principles of Strickland v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm
At its January 4, 2013 Conference, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as the authority of the U.S. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 9:48 am
The U.S. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 11:53 am
Under 1984’s Strickland v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 11:47 am
Michigan, 547 U.S. 586 (2006) (U.S. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 6:39 pm
In Bobby v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Death penalty cases leading U.S. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 6:47 pm
Roper, 2011 U.S. [read post]
19 May 2021, 2:01 pm
Graham, 490 U.S. at 396. [read post]
26 May 2022, 8:45 am
Texas, which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 12:07 pm
Cronic — in which the Supreme Court suggested that, though Strickland v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 1:40 pm
Chatman, the U.S. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:41 pm
Strickland, 2010 U.S. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:50 pm
Adam Liptak covers the U.S. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:29 pm
Strickland, No. 07-3600 A provision of Ohio Rev. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Houston, No. 07-1157 Denial of habeas relief following petitioner's conviction for first degree sexual assault is affirmed where it was proper to analyze petitioner's ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim under Strickland v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit violated basic principles of Strickland v. [read post]