Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HARDING" Results 381 - 400 of 1,296
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2017, 10:51 am by Jordan Brunner
Meanwhile, Russia’s anger has also been roused by the United States’s activation of a missile defense site in Romania. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 6:29 am
Corruption swirled around the highest levels of the United States and of China. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 1:07 pm by David Kopel
Supreme Court considers whether to enforce the Second Amendment right to "bear arms" in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:36 pm by zshapiro
The Supreme Court held in Holder v Humanitarian Law Project that one can be convicted of a crime for violating 18 U. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 1:26 pm by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
Following growing frustration on the part of the United States and allies concerned with Russia’s seemingly exclusive targeting of non-ISIS enemies of Bashar al Assad’s regime in Syria, Russian airstrikes have finally targeted Islamic State controlled areas. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 8:57 am by Erik L. Johnson
Recently, the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, America Bankers Association (ABA), National Association of Federally-Insured Credit Unions (NAFCU), Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA), American Financial Services Association (AFSA), Credit Union National Association (CUNA), and Consumer Bankers Association (CBA) together submitted its own amicus brief in Sessa v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 6:30 am by Sabina Henneberg
  The United States also showed its support for Ecuador’s democratic progress with visits by U.S. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 11:52 am by Tara Hofbauer
Michael Knapp informed us that the Second Circuit has granted an en banc rehearing of United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  For example, I’ve long taught the fascinating case of Elkison v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am by Eric Goldman
Most judges understand this distinction intuitively because they learned as 1Ls that the Constitution only restricts state action, not private action. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 9:38 am by David Gallacher and Keeley A. McCarty
It may be safe to assume that when it comes to the active ingredient, “produced” means… well, “produced” – made, created, developed, manufactured – here in the United States of America. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:00 am by James E. Pfander
Leading nineteenth century legal thinkers in the United States shared this view of the suspension clause. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:47 pm by Ronald Mann
This morning brought decisions in both of the patent cases argued in November, with the government prevailing on the constitutional question raised in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]