Search for: "US v. Atkins"
Results 381 - 400
of 521
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2010, 8:20 am
As noted in an op-ed in the Atlanta Journal Constitution by former Georgia Supreme Court Justice Norman Fletcher, Justice Stevens’ career covers the entire span of the “modern” US death penalty, from its re-instatement in 1976 (which Stevens supported) to more recent decisions restricting capital punishment by banning executions for those with mental retardation (Atkins v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:14 pm
Gardner’s contention that this court may set aside the procedural rules of the PCRA in the interests of justice and are unpersuaded that the interests of justice require us to engage in the scope of review that he requests. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:20 am
He gave two reasons for his conclusion i) It is in accordance with the true interpretation of Lord Atkin’s speech in Sim. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 12:38 pm
More on Atkins v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 1:55 pm
LEXIS 10836 (11th Cir 5/27/2010) Relief grant on Atkins/MR claim. [read post]
25 May 2010, 10:50 pm
In Caswell v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:09 am
EPA (standing) and Atkins v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:56 pm
” The case is Adidas AG, et al. v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:45 pm
Here, in addressing the question presented, the appropriate analysis is the one used in cases that involved the categorical approach, specifically Atkins, Roper, and Kennedy. [read post]
17 May 2010, 12:05 pm
Simmons and Kennedy v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:11 am
Here, in addressing the question presented, the appropriate analysis is the one used in cases that involved the categorical approach, specifically Atkins, Roper, and Kennedy. [read post]
14 May 2010, 9:02 am
Nevertheless, the Press Complaints Commission have stated that under the code of conduct Editors must take care not to use “non-compliant material from other sources”. [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:06 pm
Nicola McCann is a solicitor at Atkins Thomson. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:09 am
The recent decision in Dean Atkins and Michael Atkins v The Queen [2009] EWCA Crim 1876 provides a partial answer. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:24 pm
Later on, the Court used the same approach to find that death is cruel and unusual punishment for mentally retarded offenders (Atkins v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 4:02 am
In an application for Writ of Habeas Corpus to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Hearn asserts that he is mentally retarded and, pursuant to the Supreme Court holding in Atkins v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 10:49 pm
For one view of the old terminology, see Justice Scalia's dissent in Atkins v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:49 pm
2002 Atkins v. [read post]
