Search for: "US v. Brown" Results 381 - 400 of 7,378
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2013, 8:02 am by Samuel Franklin
[JURIST] The US District Court for the District of Utah [official website] struck down part of Utah's anti-bigamy law [statute, text] on Friday in the case of Brown v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 3:28 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] handed down decisions in three argued cases Monday, including Uttecht v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
Following the release of any opinions, the Court will hear argument in Polar Tankers, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:40 am by Maureen Cosgrove
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday ruled [opinion, PDF] unanimously in Goodyear v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
Comment The case is a useful reminder to prospective NPO applicants of the importance of satisfying both limbs of the test before an NPO will be granted and that, even if both tests are satisfied, the court may still refuse the application unless any public policy considerations can be overcome. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 11:32 am
 But he argues that his complaint was improperly dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6), and ignores the fact that the district court (wrongly) used Rule 42(b).Defendants make that point in their opposition brief on appeal, and argue the Rule 42(b) issue on the merits. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:48 am
One element used by the Appellate Division in justifying its mitigating the imposition of dismissal as a penalty was that Brown was found guilty of charges involving a single occurrence on three separate dates. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 3:51 pm by Michel-Adrien
Nadia Effendi gives us some background on Justice Moreau and what her nomination means. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 6:58 am by James Romoser
Here’s the Monday morning read: The Abortion Decision, Haunted by Brown v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
Opinion No. 20190748-CA Filed December 24, 2020 Second District Court, Farmington Department The Honorable Michael Edwards No. 134701192 Jonathan Hibshman, Marco Brown, and Rodney R. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 6:48 pm
With little useful guidance from the parties, no controlling precedent, and the three-year post-remittitur deadline for bringing the case to trial about to expire, the experienced and highly regarded trial judge concluded it does neither. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 12:16 pm
  (One of seven from today, I might add.)I don't imagine that appellant's counsel -- Timothy Bishop from Mayer Brown -- tries to pick up women in bars much, that he uses his professional status to do so, or that he'd elect to use today's case were he to decide otherwise. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 3:03 pm
Anders gave a legal history talk discussing the range of responses to Brown v. [read post]