Search for: "US v. Curry"
Results 381 - 400
of 401
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am
[Congress are] too numerous for an executive; nor can any additional powers be sufficient to enable them to protect us against foreign invasion. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 7:48 am
The Supreme Court in its famous 1969 Brandenburg v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
The techniques used in scientific research are extraordinarily diverse, from counting sheep and watching birds to detecting quasars and creating quarks. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
Cox Brainerd Currie Professor of Law Duke University School of Law Lawrence A. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
The SEC was authorized by Congress to prescribe rules to regulate the use of proxies "as necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Most recently and notably, in 2020, in Kelly v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 3:22 pm
III, Political Trials and Security Measures, 1840-1914 edited by Barry Wright & Susan BinnieThe Last Day, the Last Hour: The Currie Libel Trial by Robert J. [read post]
12 May 2019, 1:01 pm
Another decision is Public Citizen v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Noting that legislation, regulation, international accords, business trends, and physical impacts of climate change could all affect a registrant’s operations or results, the release “remind[ed] companies of their obligations under existing federal securities laws” “to consider climate change and its consequences as they prepare documents to be filed with us and provided to investors. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 8:04 am
Supreme Court in Apple v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:00 am
There’s no need to curry favor; the justices have lifelong tenure. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the beneficiary. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 4:31 am
” Touby v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 7:58 pm
Fifty-eight years later, in Brown v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
Canadian academics have suggested that Canada’s use of legal tools could even result in a “Grotian moment”—that is, a “paradigm-shifting development in which new rules and doctrines of customary international law emerge with unusual rapidity and acceptance. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 1:25 am
I plan to attend the appellate hearing, which I guess will take place in a couple of months.UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION OF THE KEY PASSAGES OF THE DECISION (with my explanations in [brackets]):In NetDoktor.de v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
Thank you Hal [Scott] for that kind introduction and for inviting me to speak today. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am
The following is a series of questions prompted by the forthcoming publication of Michael Bobelian’s “Battle for the Marble Palace: Abe Fortas, Earl Warren, Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, and the Forging of the Modern Supreme Court” (Schaffner Press, 2019). [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The number in parens is the number of times I've used the tag. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
Below you will find the UCP affiliates for New York: UCP of Greater Suffolk 250 Marcus Boulevard Hauppauge, NY 11788 Phone: (631) 232-0011 Fax: (631) 232-4422 E-mail: info@ucp-suffolk.org Web: http://www.ucp-suffolk.org 159 Indian Head Road Commack, NY 11725 Phone: (631) 543-4500 Fax: (631) 543-5162 51-33 Terryville Road Port Jefferson Station, NY 11776 Phone: (631) 474-5100 Fax: (631) 474-5100 9 Smiths Lane Commack, NY 11725 Phone: (631) 543-2338 Fax: (631) 543-5162 48 Jagger Lane… [read post]
