Search for: "US v. Ryans"
Results 381 - 400
of 2,238
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2020, 3:42 pm
Much conversation has focused on some variation of “what technology is doing to us. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 6:27 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 4:39 pm
(Many thanks to my fellow movants for participating, and to UCLA School of Law student Ryan Maister, who worked on the brief.) [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 11:20 pm
The court also rejected this theory, finding no legal basis for a machine either to own the intellectual property, or for rights in machine-generated inventions to be transferred to a human owner.Attempts to name DABUS as inventor on corresponding applications have also been rejected by the European Patent Office (EPO), and the US Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) [PDF 5.27MB].Readers who have been following developments in this case will be aware that while Thaler is named as… [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 12:21 pm
" Judge Ryan Nelson says "Yes. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 3:22 pm
How has Section 1346 been used by the Government? [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
Recent cases citing these rights together include Watson v Campos [2016] IEHC 18 (14 January 2016) [28] (Barrett J); Rooney v Shell E&P Ireland [2017] IEHC 63 (20 January 2017) [31]-[32] (Ní Raifeartaigh J); Ryanair v Channel 4 Television [2017] IEHC 651 (05 October 2017) [49]-[52] (Meenan J). [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 2:56 pm
This case was no different.Revell v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 2:56 pm
This case was no different.Revell v. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 7:30 am
(One of us, Rosenberg, was a witness in one matter.) [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 3:22 pm
As the district attorney argued in that case (Ryan v. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 12:28 pm
Ryan Moore. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
As the district court explained, in Ryan (Ryan v. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 1:04 pm
_______________ [1] Early use of the term “stakeholder” primarily referenced specified non-stockholder constituencies (named in anti-takeover “constituency statutes” adopted by over 30 states starting in the early 1980s) that a board was permitted to consider as potentially having identifiable interests in a corporation — such as employees, customers, suppliers and local communities in which the corporation operated, and sometimes state and… [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 6:06 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 9:08 am
Hudson v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 5:06 am
We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Balkin, Obergefell v. [read post]
