Search for: "US v. Simmons"
Results 381 - 400
of 746
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2009, 1:15 pm
Simmons, in which the court abolished the juvenile death penalty. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
" Citing Simmons v Trans Express Inc., 37 NY3d 107, the Appellate Division observed that notwithstanding the fact that Plaintiffs, as retirees, were not involved in the two underlying arbitrations, "the identity of parties is not an element of this doctrine". [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
" Citing Simmons v Trans Express Inc., 37 NY3d 107, the Appellate Division observed that notwithstanding the fact that Plaintiffs, as retirees, were not involved in the two underlying arbitrations, "the identity of parties is not an element of this doctrine". [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 5:51 am
Simmons, twenty states had allowed the execution of murderers who committed their crimes before the age of 18. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 8:14 am
Simmons v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:10 am
The Fifth Circuit ordered the district court to narrowly interpret certain restrictions that it had imposed on the Appellant's use of the Internet, holding, for example, that requiring Appellant to secure written permission each time he used the Internet would be unreasonably restrictive. 10. [read post]
4 May 2011, 3:00 am
Simmons v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 1:38 pm
U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, September 11, 2009 Simmons v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 9:29 am
Trade mark enthusiasts will be certainly aware that a few days ago bad news reached Red Bull.Katfriend Darren Meale (Simmons&Simmons) explains it all.Here's what Darren writes:"Red Bull, the energy drink brand phenomenon, comes in blue and silver cans. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:18 am
Simmons-Harris, the court said that it was constitutionally permissible for the government to allow vouchers to be used in parochial schools. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:53 pm
The defendant "must simply be aware that his conduct is likely to result in harm to a child, whether directed at the child or not" (id. at 371-372, citing PL 15.05[2]; see also People v Simmons, 92 NY2d 829, 830 [1998]). [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:39 am
At USA Today, Kevin Johnson reports that the FBI has already cut back on its use of GPS surveillance after last month’s decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 12:08 pm
It’s time for the seventh volume of Retromark, Darren Meale (Simmons & Simmons)’s rundown of notable trade mark cases over the past six months.Over to Darren:Retromark Volume VII: the last six months in trade marksIt’s now three years since I began Retromark, and we are on to a seventh volume. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm
A ruling in Oklahoma v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 3:35 am
The rest of us do. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:36 am
SIMMONS; RAYMOND BENNETT, PRESSLY M. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:59 pm
Agostini v. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 11:32 am
People v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 7:41 pm
In a federal case I testified in recently (US v Simmons), the defendant's compliance with the Oregon Medical Marijuana Act was material in the case because in the application for search warrant, the DEA agent referenced the Ogden & Cole memos (which describe the U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 8:31 pm
The Court in Carter v. [read post]
