Search for: "United States v. Ahmed"
Results 381 - 399
of 399
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2007, 3:20 am
• United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 3:16 am
POTTER, POSTMASTER GEN.06-1346 ALI, AHMED V. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 8:21 pm
The main difference between the two cases is that Ahmed S. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 1:47 am
[www.nylj.com]
United States, appellee v. [read post]
2 Sep 2007, 9:52 pm
Court of Military Commission Review in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 10:48 am
" In June 2004, the Supreme Court's Rasul decision held that because the naval base at Guantánamo Bay was under the exclusive control of the United States, the federal habeas corpus statute extended to detainees held there. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 9:25 am
Only the United States -- that is, the prosecution before a war crimes trial commission - may pursue pre-trial appeals. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 2:40 pm
United States, No. 06-1196: "1. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 12:20 pm
One of the convicts in the coup and assassination of the founding President of Bangladesh Sheikh Mujibur Rahman has been deported from United States to Bangaldesh. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 3:17 pm
Hamdan may seek further review in the Supreme Court of the United States at the earliest available opportunity. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 2:30 pm
Amazon.com, Inc., CV-05-04753-AHM (9th Cir. [read post]
1 May 2007, 11:01 pm
Supreme Court declined pretrial review of the military commissions expected to try detainees Omar Khadr and Salim Ahmed Hamdan, U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 12:26 pm
Making a non-legal argument, the reply said that "the reputation of the United States is on the line in these novel and untested trials. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 1:22 pm
Bush (06-1195) and Al Odah v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 4:30 am
Appeals court throws out 1 Ressam felony conviction, Seattle Times, Jan. 17, 2007.Ressam is represented by federal public defender Tom Hillier (also a Trial Ad instructor).The case is here: United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 6:59 am
But noncitizens like Hamdan don't have the sort of "substantial connection with our country" that justifies invoking the constitutional right to habeas corpus, the Supreme Court ruled in 1990, in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 12:12 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeAlleged Mobsters' Cell Phone Conversations Intercepted by 'Roving Bugs' Denied Suppression United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 7:48 pm
Demner, The Nuclear Terrorism Convention: Will Detainees Be Classified as "Enemy Combatants" by the United States Harvard Law Review, Volume 120, Number 1, November 2006 Neal Kumar Katyal, Hamdan v. [read post]
15 Jul 2006, 7:32 am
But, like a lot of conservatives, he was so irritated by the Supreme Court's decision in Hamdan v. [read post]
