Search for: "United States v. Alexander Grant" Results 381 - 400 of 414
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2009, 2:25 am
In a states' rights oriented decision, United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 2:59 am
After a series of court battles, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 10:27 am
Any kind of more or less unreflected import of concepts from the United States should be denied in p [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 3:36 pm
The Supreme Court of Illyria, mirabile dictu, displays an uncanny resemblance to the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 1:09 am
Click here to go to www.nylj.com United States, respondent-appellant v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 9:53 am
  Article II, Section I of the Constitution provides that "No Person except a natural born citizen of the United States . . . shall be eligible to the Office of President. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 7:43 am
Several Rehnquist Court decisions, such as United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 4:32 am
One such so-called maxim originated with Justice Stone's "Footnote Four" in the 1938 case of United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
Cain, No. 07-30709 In a collateral proceeding in a murder case, grant of habeas relief is affirmed where: 1) petitioner adequately exhausted his claims in state court; 2) the admission of hearsay testimony at his trial was erroneous; and 3) the state court's holding that the error was harmless was contrary to, and an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
Alexander, No. 07-1758 A sentence for possessing crack cocaine with the intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not commit a plain error in designating defendant a career offender for sentencing purposes as he committed a prior crime of violence, and he otherwise satisfied the criteria necessary to be considered a career offender; and 2) the sentence was otherwise reasonable. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Alexander    Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 08a0299p.06 2008/08/18 Jerman v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Rodriguez-Amaya, No. 06-4514 Conviction for unlawful reentry after deportation by an aggravated felon is affirmed where the time defendant was detained by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement on administrative charges pending his removal was not detention "in connection with" his arrest, thus defendant's indictment did not violate the Speedy Trial Act. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Alexander, No. 06-1867 A sentence for sexual abuse of a minor is vacated and remanded where the district court plainly erred in failing to provide notice of an upward variance as required by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(h). [read post]