Search for: "United States v. Articles of Food and Drug"
Results 381 - 400
of 511
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2012, 3:48 am
The Soil Association formally objected to the plans because of the ‘increased disease risk and poor welfare conditions” of intensive units. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:39 am
The would-be class consisted of:all other persons similarly situated, throughout the United States, who are domociled [sic] in one of the fifty states, including Ohio, and who are consumers who received ANY vaccine or drug with a PharmaJet injector device where the specific vaccine or specific drug does not have the stated approval by the FDA for administration with a “needleless injector” or “needle-free injector,”… [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 8:28 am
To that I would respond that I have read many communications apparently from you that either state explicitly that you are an attorney ("I am an attorney if that helps you sleep at night" [http://whitecoatunderground.com/2011/12/01/when-did-the-burzynski-clinic-start-harassing-bloggers/]) to ones where you imply that you are an attorney ("So, when I present to the juror that my client and his cancer treatment has went up against 5 Grand Juries which involved the Food… [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 6:23 am
All of these actions constituted violations of the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, making many of Ranbaxy’s drugs adulterated, potentially unsafe and illegal to sell in the United States. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:01 pm
A colleague recently drew my attention to the proposition that "in the United States, the specter of class-action lawsuits imposes a higher level of precaution on the part of drug makers. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
#1 — DiCosolo v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:33 am
New York is, like Pennsylvania and New Jersey, a Frye state (as in, Frye v United States, 293 F 1013) that permits “expert testimony based on scientific principles, procedures, or theories only after the principles, procedures, or theories have gained general acceptance in the relevant scientific field. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:02 pm
So, when I present to the juror that my client and his cancer treatment has went up against 5 Grand Juries which involved the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the National Cancer Institute (NCI), Aetna Life Insurance, Emprise, Inc., Texas State Medical Board, and the United States Government, and was found not guilty in all 5 cases, you will wish you never wrote your article. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:59 am
Felony violations of the 1938 Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act include adulterating or misbranding a food, along with putting an adulterated or misbranded food into interstate commerce.Convictions "with the intent to defraud or mislead" are punishable by up to three years in jail, plus a fine of up to $10,000 on each count. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 10:21 am
That garden variety claim is preempted by the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which forbids states from imposing any requirement in food labeling that is not "identical" to the federal act. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:01 pm
Indeed, there are literally hundreds of well-accepted off-label uses listed in compendia such as the United States Pharmacopeial Drug Information, and the American Hospital Formulary Service Drug Information for which federal government programs provide reimbursement notwithstanding their off-label status. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:39 pm
Koustas – We have previously reported (here, here, here, and here) on the court struggle in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (“the Court”) between FDA and Regenerative Sciences, Inc. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:17 am
Respondent noted in the application that she planned on being in the United States for three months. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 2:59 am
Here is her summary:The FDA and ImportsThe Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is responsible for ensuring that imported foods are safe and that unsafe imported foods will not reach consumers.[1] Under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), FDA has the authority to prevent the admission of any imported products that violate the Act. [2] Refusing Entry after InspectionFDA has the power to refuse admission of a product if, upon… [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 10:06 am
Of course many media outlets are picking up on United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 1:10 pm
Classen’s claims are neither “tied to a particular machine or apparatus” nor do they ‘transform[] a particular article into a different state or thing. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:57 pm
Caputo, 517 F.3d 935 (7th Cir. 2008), but it’s dictum.It’s not all sweetness and light though, as the district court decision being appealed in Caronia demonstrates, United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 11:46 am
In 2009 the Feds seized several guitars and pallets of wood from a Gibson factory, and both sides have been wrangling over the goods in a case with the delightful name "United States of America v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:41 am
’ See also United States v. [read post]
Healthcare and Federalism: Should courts strictly scrutinize federal regulation of medical services?
14 Aug 2011, 8:39 am
(This latter point distinguishes standards of professional care from standards for the design of highly mobile pharmaceuticals -- hence, the need for the Food, Drug, & Cosmetic Act). [read post]
