Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 381 - 400
of 9,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2023, 11:35 am
This post is by Carlos Manuel Vázquez, a professor of law at Georgetown Law School. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
” United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
The SEC’s response to the Chamber of Commerce’s petition for review of the Share Repurchase Disclosure Modernization rulemaking, whose timing coincided with the imposition of an excise tax on buybacks under the Inflation Reduction Act, at length seeks to refute the Chamber’s First Amendment claims, while also seeking to bolster the rigor of the agency’s economic analysis (Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 2:05 am
” Gerald Groff was a rural mail carrier employed by the United States Postal Service (USPS). [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:06 am
Constitution requires to be eligible to serve as the President of the United States. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 1:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:56 am
The government submits that the United States has a significant interest in the question presented because the DOL enforces the SOX provision and the SEC has an interest in protecting whistleblowers. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
In United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
In Smith v. the United States, 599 U.S. ____ (2023), the U.S. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm
Smith v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 7:35 am
Smith v. [read post]
13 Aug 2023, 12:43 pm
See Hess v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 11:02 am
’” United States v. 564.54 Acres of Land, 441 U.S. 506, 510–11 (1979) (quoting Olson v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:04 am
He agreed and stipulated to the factual basis for his guilty plea and agreed that if the case were to proceed to trial, the United States could prove the agreed-to facts beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 7:07 am
In 2012, Groff took a mail delivery job with the United States Postal Service. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
That pressure has only grown following the Supreme Court’s recent decision against affirmative action in SFFA v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 4:05 pm
Affected states see increased political turnover and reduced regulatory burdens. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 9:12 pm
In Brown Shoe v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 11:22 am
United Neighborhoods for Los Angeles v. [read post]
