Search for: "United States v. Choice" Results 381 - 400 of 6,465
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2014, 3:07 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
 “This case, in particular, presents one of the most egregious examples of an individual flouting the laws against ivory trafficking that has been prosecuted in the United States,” the prosecutor wrote.Attorney Alva argued in a separate memorandum “why [Gordon] is a poor choice for a ‘poster child’ in the ‘war’ againstthe illegal elephantivory trade,” explaining that “Mr. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 6:55 am by Eugene Volokh
We recently held that "'the government may not deny a benefit to a person on a basis that infringes his constitutionally protected ... freedom of speech even if he has no entitlement to that benefit.'" United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:58 pm by Patricia Hughes
Earlier this month, the Ontario Divisional Court released its decision (by the Court) in Canadian Federation of Students v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 11:04 am by ernst
Constitutional law scholars such as Aziz Huq have explained: “For instance, the draft majority opinion spills a good deal of ink on the history of abortion regulation in England and the United States (skimming over, as it does it, the considerable periods in which abortion was left to the free choice of women). [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 10:00 am
Army Corps of Engineers' Jurisdictional Determination ("JD") that the property under review was a wetland that constitutes "waters of the United States" and thereby subject to the permitting and enforcement authority of the Corps, can be reviewed by the federal courts on an immediate basis. [read post]
10 May 2022, 2:08 pm by Ilya Somin
Similarly, there are no territorial limits on the federal government's jurisdiction within the United States. [read post]
United States, three protestors stood up and spoke out against the court’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:01 pm by Orin Kerr
Holder, from Judge Kessler of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, who concludes the mandate is constitutional. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
Kitchen urges Supreme Court review of the 10th Circuit's 2-1 decision (see prior posting), saying in part:This case presents an immensely important question: whether the United States Constitution compels states to adopt a single marriage policy that every individual is allowed “to marry the person of their choice. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 7:26 am
In this case, then, the lesser deference given by the district court to the European Plaintiffs' choice of forum was consistent with the treaty obligations of the United States. [read post]