Search for: "United States v. Classic" Results 381 - 400 of 1,746
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2020, 1:44 pm
This 55-page opinion from the Ninth Circuit tells you probably more than you would ever want to know about soybean farming (and cotton farming) in the United States -- and, in particular, (1) how we get rid of weeds in modern farming, and (2) just how dependent we are on both (a) Round-Up and its follow-on chemicals (here, dicamba) and (b) genetically modified seeds that protect crops against such chemicals. [read post]
25 May 2020, 10:30 am by Guest Blogger
(It’s a classic risk for the social sciences – how to move from description to prescription.) [read post]
17 May 2020, 8:14 am
  The connection with accounting remained, but reduced to a dimension increasingly rejected by Western society as abhorrent to its ideals emerging from the Enlightenment (famously in Dostoevsky, Brothers Karamazov (Constance Garnett, trans.: NY Lowell Press) Bk V, Chp V, The Grand Inquisitor)). [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
There’s truth here, but it’s also worth noting that such arguments can prove too much: why not cities or counties or even smaller units rather than states? [read post]
4 May 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Jackson, in his famous Veto of the bill renewing the charter of the Bank of the United States declared first that “Mere precedent is a dangerous source of authority…. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 5:42 pm by Carl Neff and Kasey DeSantis
Within the High Court’s analysis under Section 102, the Court further addressed case law, including the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 9:46 pm by David Super
  Social Security (Old-Age, Survivors and Disability Insurance) is one such program; the Judgment Fund (for judgments rendered against the United States) is another. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:59 am by Chris Wesner
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS In re: NASHEL : : : : : Jose J. [read post]