Search for: "United States v. Cole"
Results 381 - 400
of 569
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2007, 11:04 pm
United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001).11 Id. at 40.12 Id. at 34. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am
In particular, the Court must examine whether the decision-making process leading to measures of interference was fair and such as to afford due respect to the interests safeguarded to the individual by Article 8 (see Buckley v. the United Kingdom, 25 September 1996, § 76, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV; Chapman v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27138/95, § 92, ECHR 2001-I; and Connors, cited above, §§ 83 and 92) 68. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 1:49 pm
Precisely because Brown has become the crown jewel of the United States Reports, every constitutional theory must claim Brown for itself. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 9:03 pm
As CDR Mizer explains, “international law does not permit the United States the authority to punish acts against French ships, Iranian oil, Bulgarian nationals, or Malaysian contracts. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm
” Both cases involve lawsuits by victims of the terrorist bombing of the USS Cole against the Republic of Sudan as a state sponsor of terrorism. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
In the consultation report of the neurologist states: “Neurontin is wholly appropriate in this patient. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:38 am
United States, 19-7320, a sequel to Stokeling v. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:09 am
Ben also contrasted Donald Trump’s latest proposal to bar Muslims from entering the United States with Mai El-Sadany’s piece on being an American Muslim these days. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 7:56 pm
In United States v. al-Bahlul, the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR) continues the dangerous flirtation with the Nuremberg membership cases that it began with its Hamdan decision in June. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 8:46 am
United States, 2010 U.S. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 11:37 am
This would create in state habeas law a remedy for lawyers' failure to advised their clients of collateral consequences, following a recent SCOTUS precedent on-point in Padilla v. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 2:48 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 9:04 pm
 A recent case (McEvoy v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 2:30 pm
Before joining the Court, Justice Kavanaugh had voiceddoubts about the soundness of the Watergate precedents, specifically, the Court’s unanimous United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm
” And, as to lifetime detention of U.S. persons, the bill by its very terms (thanks to an amendment introduced by Senator Feinstein) confirms what would have been the proper reading anyway—namely, that its detention authorization provision (section 1021) does not “affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in… [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:43 pm
” And, as to lifetime detention of U.S. persons, the bill by its very terms (thanks to an amendment introduced by Senator Feinstein) confirms what would have been the proper reading anyway—namely, that its detention authorization provision (section 1021) does not “affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested… [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 5:17 am
And in Edmond v. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 7:35 am
The Idaho resource guide for cerebral palsy was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am
United States, 15-5238, out of the way. [read post]
