Search for: "United States v. Democratic Executive Committee"
Results 381 - 400
of 502
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm
President Donald Trump’s Executive Order on domestic safety eliminates Privacy Act protection for foreigners, as it directs U.S. government agencies to “ensure that their privacy policies exclude persons who are not United States citizens or lawful permanent residents from the protections of the Privacy Act regarding personally identifiable information,” but only if doing so is “consistent with applicable law. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 4:50 am
” The lawsuit charges the economic adviser “is wrongfully retaining Presidential records that are the property of the United States, and which constitute part of the permanent historical record of the prior administration. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 3:56 pm
These include the preamble to the Constitution Act, 1867 (“a Constitution similar in Principle to that of the United Kingdom”), at least by inference if not explicitly (see, for example, Quong Wing v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:58 am
But in June, the Supreme Court in Holder v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 5:41 pm
United StatesParler v. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 4:25 pm
United States The Financial Stability Board has issued a note to finance ministers of the G-20 on the development [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
The plaintiffs had challenged the state’s denial of a “Choose Life” license plate after two pro-choice Missouri senators registered their opposition and the committee charged with issuing the plates rejected the plaintiffs’ request for reconsideration of the denial. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm
Greece The Committee to Protect Journalists had an alert on Greek authorities who should overturn the conviction of journalist Kostas Vaxevanis on appeal and reform the country’s outdated criminal defamation laws. [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:01 pm
One Democratic Senator, however, deprived the committee of a unanimous vote, saying that “we should learn to work with the Republicans. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm
To take the position that their decision is neither subject to review by a more democratically representative organ of state (however "wrong" they may be) strikes as odd in this context with human rights and democratic legitimacy at its core.3. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Supreme Court’s statement in Reiter v. [read post]
1 May 2021, 4:17 pm
United StatesCNN v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm
Barrett became a hero to many religious conservatives after her 2017 confirmation hearing for her seat on the court of appeals, when Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee – most notably, Sen. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 7:41 am
In Texas v. [read post]
2 May 2025, 3:10 am
United StatesChristopher Kohls v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am
He chairs the Senate Finance Committee, and serves on the Energy and Natural Resources Committee, the Budget Committee, and the Select Committee on Intelligence; he also is the lead Senate Democrat on the Joint Committee on Taxation. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 3:02 am
The restriction which Lord Scarman formulated (and in which all the other members of the Appellate Committee concurred) was endorsed by Lord Bridge (and all his colleagues) in Hammersmith. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 5:04 pm
Jim McDermott (D-Wash.), then the highest-ranking Democrat on the House ethics committee. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 3:34 am
But it’s not a good thing that no foreign-born person can be president of the United States. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 3:36 pm
Furthermore, every State in the United States has a law which says that trusts in real property can be created only by a writing signed by the owner of the property. [read post]
