Search for: "United States v. Doe Co." Results 381 - 400 of 8,540
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2014, 9:38 pm
[H]e states that while the unambiguous language of § 141 does not explicitly provide for such delegation, the section does not explicitly bar it either [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 5:28 pm by Lawrence Solum
City of Chicago a narrow 5-4 plurality held that the “Second Amendment right recognized in Heller” is incorporated to the States as applied to United States citizens. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:51 pm by Marty Lederman
 I suspect it never enjoyed a United States copyright--which makes it an even more apt hypothetical in the context of Golan.] [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 5:30 am
Related posts:Machine Might Not be Patentable Subject MatterLast week I was in Arlington, Virginia, teaching the PLI Patent Bar Review Course, so I was a bit ouCAFC Says “Patented Invention” Does Not Include MethodsIn the 1972 case of Deepsouth Packing Co. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 2:53 pm
In what could be termed a sequel to the Supreme Court's 1972 decision in Deepsouth Packing Co. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 1:20 am
The complaint (full text) in New York State Division of Human Rights v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am by Allison Trzop
United States, in which the Court made it harder for the federal government to use the fact of a prior criminal conviction to increase a criminal sentence; American Express Co. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 9:47 am by PaulKostro
United States Fidelity Co., 269 U.S. 483, 487, 46 S. [read post]