Search for: "United States v. Dutch"
Results 381 - 400
of 768
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2023, 6:05 am
Russia has objected to them, a controversial opinion by an Advisory Committee of Dutch scholars has argued that Putin retains his immunity before the ICC, and while the United States supports the ICC’s investigation in Ukraine, the Pentagon continues to insist that it objects to the Court’s exercise of jurisdiction over non-State party nationals. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 7:51 pm
, the amendment has the potential to reverse in part the Supreme Court’s decision in Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum and to turn the ATA into a mini Alien Tort Statute. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 10:12 pm
Apple and Apple v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 6:30 am
To be sure, those loyal to the United States, regardless of race, needed protection for their civil rights. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 7:47 pm
… There’s no connection to the United States whatsoever. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 1:00 am
On Tuesday 15 December, the Supreme Court will hear the case of General Dynamics United Kingdom Ltd v State of Libya. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:03 am
And until Kiobel, corporations headquartered or doing business in the United States have always been liable, as well. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:03 am
And until Kiobel, corporations headquartered or doing business in the United States have always been liable, as well. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
The Dutch version has been pulled from the shelves and an investigation into the error has begun. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 6:13 am
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply United States Steel Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 6:31 am
The court’s answer to this question is in line with its decision in Wiemer & Trachte v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:31 am
United States, 171 F.2d 921, 936 (1st Cir.1948); United States v. al Liby, 23 F. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
” Judge Mazzant wrote: “Shavers argues that the BTCST investments are not securities because Bitcoin is not money, and is not part of anything regulated by the United States. [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:19 am
United States, a challenge to the constitutionality of court-martial jurisdiction over a civilian contractor. [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
One of the four widows, Esther Kiobel had brought a suit against Shell in the United States. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 10:21 am
The case of Bauman v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 11:03 am
The CJEU stated that European Union law does not preclude the proprietor of a national trademark from opposing the import of identical goods bearing the same trade mark and coming from another Member State, in which said trade mark, which initially belonged to the same proprietor, is currently owned by a third party. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:47 pm
To the more contemporary antitrust matter: Conclusions of Law and Order: United States of America v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm
There’s no connection to the United States whatsoever. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 5:43 am
The Cases of the United States and the NetherlandsBibi Van Ginkel, Combating International Terrorism: New Powers for the Security Council? [read post]
