Search for: "United States v. Englander"
Results 381 - 400
of 2,059
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2011, 6:12 pm
United States, 80 S. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 12:01 am
But if in fact the instructions issued in Georgia v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Dear Rich staffer Steve (The Public Domain) Fishman provided this answer:Stephen FishmanUnlike the United Kingdom, the United States does not follow the rule of the shorter term. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am
In his ruling on A & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Health [2014] EWHC 1364 (Admin) Mr Justice King held that the claimant, whose ordinary/usual residence was in Northern Ireland, was not entitled to access in England abortion services free of charge. (13 May 2014). [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:16 am
Edoho v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch). [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 9:50 am
By Eric Goldman Trout Point Lodge, Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 11:00 am
In a case of first impression nationally, the Third Circuit in United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 3:52 am
The Facts The facts are simply stated. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 12:36 am
He then proceeded consider the case law from Ontario and other Canadian jurisdictions, as well as the United States, England and Wales, Australia and New Zealand. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm
The Appeals Court explains that NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, operates the Seabrook, New Hampshire, Unit 1 nuclear power plant, which provides a significant portion of the baseload electric power used in New England. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 9:08 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 6:41 am
The National Health Service is England’s publicly funded national healthcare system. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 11:00 pm
However, that Act does not apply to Bermuda, because Bermuda is not a part of the United Kingdom (whatever the Convention might say). [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 11:44 am
On appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, a three-judge panel reversed the district court’s order. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
In NML Capital v Argentina, the question for the Supreme Court was whether one such investor, a New York fund that bought into Argentinian bonds which were subsequently defaulted, could enforce its judgment against assets of the Argentinian state in the United Kingdom. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:55 am
When asked about this case Google Bard said Gupta v British Broadcasting Corporation was a defamation case in the High Court of England and Wales. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 9:47 pm
There are now more than two dozen such lawsuits pending in states from New England to Hawaii. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:36 am
Wong, 13-1074, and United States v. [read post]
