Search for: "United States v. General Instrument Corporation"
Results 381 - 400
of 593
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2013, 11:59 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in National Australia Bank v. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm
On the 2012 Roundtable, see, Paper Delivered at the 2012 Penn State Law and Semiotics Roundtable: The Corporation as Semiosis, “Citizens United,” the Signification of the Corporate Enterprise and the Development of Law Law at the End of the Day, March 3, 2012; on the 2011 Roundtable see Larry Catá Backer, The 2011 Kevelson Workshop on Law and Semiotics at Penn State--Outstanding Student Presentations, Law at the End of… [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 11:45 am
Here's the proposed agreement, now bearing signatures on behalf of both parties: Microsoft-Google Orange Book Offer Countersigned on 11JAN2013 by General Instrument Corporation was a Motorola subsidiary and is now, by extension, a Google subsidiary. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 6:49 am
That same day, United States Magistrate Judge Gudrun Rice approved the warrant. . . . [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 6:36 pm
The Corporate Veil: Corporate law is, for the most part, a creature of state law. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
United States of America v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 7:52 pm
Jindal Global University; Formerly Professor and Dean, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, India Enforcing Socio-Economic Rights through Public Interest Litigation: An Overview of the Indian Experience 3) Dr Leïla Choukroune, Senior Lecturer in International Economic Law, Faculty of Law, Maastricht University, The Netherlands The Paradox of Justiciability: Labour PIL in China and India Questions/Comments 6:30pm-8:30pm – Welcome Dinner hosted by the City University Law School (by… [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 7:53 am
No. 198 v. [read post]
13 Oct 2012, 9:23 pm
4. 1986 Act was replaced by the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (for short, ‘2000 Act’). 2000 Act has been enacted to carry forward the constitutional philosophy engrafted in Articles 15(3), 39(e) and (f), 45 and 47 of the Constitution and also incorporate the standards prescribed in the Convention on the Rights of the Child, United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice, 1985, the United Nations… [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:46 pm
In a press release, leaders of the Native American Contractors Association and the United States Hispanic Chamber of Commerce blasted the DoD for overreaching in response to Dynalantic Corporation v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:46 pm
In a press release, leaders of the Native American Contractors Association and the United States Hispanic Chamber of Commerce blasted the DoD for overreaching in response to Dynalantic Corporation v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 8:25 am
Filed August 16, 2012) (click here for .pdf of Complaint) Debtor Raving Brands, Inc. was the subject of an involuntary case under Chapter 7 of Title 11 of the United States Code on April 1, 2009. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
However, recognizing that the proposed Amendment remedies are merely a short-term solution, Part V, also reprinted below, questions the compatibility of speculative invoicing with copyright law’s underlying goals and purposes, and makes some arguments in favor of systemic reform of copyright law more generally, an issue with which Questioncopyright.org is intimately familiar. ... [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:44 pm
Instrument, L.L.C. v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 5:16 am
The Delaware court sets the standard of review using the the four-factor formula set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Reves v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 4:21 pm
The Episcopal Diocese of Fort Worth became a member of the Episcopal Church in the United States of America effective January 1, 1983. [read post]
24 May 2012, 6:51 am
The participants in instruments that led to that last crisis operated in a very opaque if not downright murky environment. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:35 am
” Citizens United v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm
JERICHO STATE CAPITAL CORP. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 10:08 am
To wit, while no petition has yet been filed, the Solicitor General has confirmed that he will seek review in FTC v. [read post]
