Search for: "United States v. Goodwill" Results 381 - 400 of 486
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
– EIPR article (PatLit)   United States US Patent Reform Dr. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 2:23 pm
By Jeff Pietsch Last week, a United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri denied a motion by Intel to dismiss a declaratory judgment suit brought by Express Scripts Inc. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 2:07 pm by Usha Rodrigues
Many have already weighed in on Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 3:34 am
(Michael Geist) Live blogging from World’s Fair Use Day (Public Knowledge) (Public Knowledge) (Public Knowledge) (Public Knowledge) (Public Knowledge) (Public Knowledge)   Australia Australia and New Zealand strengthen collaboration to increase harmonisation of trade mark examination practices (Managing IP)   Austria Leopold Foundation investigation report issued: Austria to investigate Leopold Museum, Victim compensation promised (Copyright Litigation Blog)   Brazil INPI is… [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 7:23 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
--Court: United States District Court for the District of ColoradoOpinion Date: 12/11/09Cite: Taxsalelists.com, LLC v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 3:33 am
Faced with the continuing rise of Nazi power, Clara sent her two daughters [*4] to the United States after Gustav's death. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 3:59 pm
                   Introduction  The sports business industry is one of the largest and fastest growing industries in the United States. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 7:43 am
However, many judges are unwilling to take this step for fear that the injunction order extends beyond what is necessary to strike the proper balance of competing rights. -- Court: United States District Court for the District of Nebraska Opinion Date: 7/2/09 Cite: Softchoice Corp. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 3:00 am
 A Spanish importer/distributor sold Spanish Kids dolls in the United States. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 6:41 pm
After the action was filed, F&R recorded its Security Agreement against WYD’s thirteen trademarks with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”).F&R eventually was granted summary judgment in its state court breach of contract action and the court awarded F&R $348,651.18 [ed. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 1:02 am
However, the judge did not err in applying Article 7(1)(e); what he had actually done was to state that the policy underlying that article was relevant to the assessment of whether there was a sufficient similarity for the purposes of Article 9(1)(c), both the mark and the sign being shapes. * An assessment of similarity had to be carried out on a global basis by reference to the degree of similarity between the mark and the sign (here the Court cited Case C-252/07 Intel Corp Inc v… [read post]