Search for: "United States v. Henning" Results 381 - 400 of 731
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2023, 4:03 am
Applicant claimed acquired distinctiveness based on several years of use in the United States and sales representing some 17 million bars of soap, but the Board found the evidence insufficient. [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:14 pm by Stuart Benjamin
Hartlage, the United States Supreme Court confronted a state statute very similar to § 599. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Guest Author
All the other cases were decided under Step One or under an exception, such as United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 7:48 pm
[w] hen there are many interpretations, according to the option Preamble according to the prevails . [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:33 am
Dodd, 598 F.3d 449, 452–53 (U.S.Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit 2010)); see also United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 10:13 am by Sherrilyn Ifill
However, the court also stressed that Phillips’ refusal to serve Charlie Craig and David Mullins occurred before the Supreme Court recognized the constitutional right of same-sex couples to marry in United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 2:10 am by Jani
This question was answered first when gaming was in its infancy, but still remains quite relevant in today's world of gaming and law.The case in question was Atari v North American Philips Consumer Electronics, decided by the United States Court of Appeals in 1982. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:01 am by Eric Goldman
(The Act defines “unlawful activity” to include prostitution offenses that are “in violation of the laws of the State in which they are committed or of the United States. [read post]
31 May 2012, 1:21 pm by Eric Turkewitz
This is the heart and soul of the decision: That premise is inconsistent with the reasoning underlying the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Lawrence v Texas (539 US 558 [2003]), in which the Court held that laws criminalizing homosexual conduct violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution (id. at 578). [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 1:17 pm
In violation of Title 18, United States Code, s 1503. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 7:03 pm by Nikki Siesel
This decision is significant because it will impact a trademark owner’s decision-making process when determining whether to utilize the administrative dispute resolution tribunal of the United States Patent & Trademark Office (known as the TTAB) or to initiate an action before a federal district court. [read post]