Search for: "United States v. Kennedy" Results 381 - 400 of 4,510
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2020, 8:30 am by Guest Blogger
  That did not happen in the United States, and the authors provide some insight into why. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 1:20 pm by Linda McClain
” Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg made this declaration in her majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
"  Steven Skowronek describes a cyclical phenomenon when he observes that the United States experiences reconstructive, affiliated, and disjunctive presidents in regular succession. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
This term, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in Jones v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 11:21 am by Justice Goodwin Liu
Having now, as a judge myself, experienced disagreement over matters far less consequential than the presidency of the United States, I have even more regard for how she navigated that challenging period. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
Una vez derrotado en el Senado el nombramiento de Robert Bork, el presidente Ronald Reagan nominó a Anthony Kennedy, que fue confirmado. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 9:14 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
There have been smart, enterprising, and strong women in the United States since its founding, but a woman has been on the Supreme Court only since September 25, 1981. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm by Amy Howe
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 5:45 am by Josh Blackman
The court divided, sharply, about whether a consumer could sue a foreign manufacturer in state court over a product sold in the United States. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Will he lead the “transformation” that the United States desperately needs? [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 4:03 am by Michael Boyd
Panetta was a lawsuit filed in 2012 challenging the targeted drone killings by the United States of three U.S. citizens in Yemen. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am by Paul Rosenzweig, Vishnu Kannan
More pointedly, it provides (in §606(c)) that: Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order to preserve the neutrality of the United States, the President, if he deems it necessary in the interest of national security or defense, may suspend or amend, for such time as he may see fit, the rules and regulations applicable to any or all stations or devices… [read post]