Search for: "United States v. Lawing" Results 381 - 400 of 68,725
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2008, 2:45 pm
But since the federal law itself seemed in this instance to incorporate state law in this respect, Toy argued to the CCA that a recording made in violation of Hawaii's two-party consent law was inadmissible under federal law as well. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 2:44 am
" Section 1498(a) further provides that whenever a patented invention "is used or manufactured by or for the United States without license of the owner thereof . . . the owner's remedy shall be by action against the United States in the [CFC] for the recovery of his reasonable and entire compensation for such use or manufacture. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:38 am by Calvin Massey
The United States' case against Tarek Mehanna is going to trial in Boston today. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 10:38 pm by Mary L. Dudziak
United States rely on the 1876 decision of Chy Lung v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 2:39 pm by Mike "No Man" Navarre
For those in DC wanting to see the historic argument in United States v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 8:00 am by Paul Caron
Lipman (UNLV; Google Scholar), Not Taxing Puerto Rico: Whitewashing Impoverishment in United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 11:25 am by Unreported Opinions
After the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 1:42 am by Immigration Prof
United States: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in the Crimmigration Context by Thea Johnson & Emily Arvizu, Harvard Latin American Law Review (previously Harvard Latino Law Review), (Spring 2022 Forthcoming) Abstract Ineffective assistance of counsel (IAC)... [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 12:39 pm by Shima Baradaran
There has been much discussion in the news, blogosphere, and general ruminations about the Supreme Court's January opinion in United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 10:23 am
Kaczmarek v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Court of Appeal “A citizen of a European Union member state who had no right to live in the United Kingdom under domestic or European law, even though she was lawfully present, was not eligible for income support. [read post]