Search for: "United States v. Nice"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,553
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2017, 11:52 am
United States and Printz v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:02 am
However, starting with United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 5:29 am
Respondent Shannon Harless was a citizen of the United States of America and a legal permanent resident of France. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 4:37 am
Following the discussion about the utility of the Supreme Court stating a rule as to whether, and for how long, a car stop can be extended beyond its lawful justification, all of which arose out of the Supreme Court’s grant of cert in Rodriguez v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am
The “presumption of regularity” that attaches to all federal officials’ actions, United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:11 am
The state claims that the Waller v. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 9:57 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:27 am
See United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 3:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 10:43 am
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court held that service advisors at car dealerships are exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) overtime pay requirement under an exemption for any “salesman, partsman, or mechanic primarily engaged in selling or servicing automobiles …” (Encino Motorcars, LLC v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 7:00 am
United States Patent & Trademark Office, et al. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 4:30 am
United States, 2016 WL 403310 (7th Cir. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 2:18 pm
United States, No. 06-7949, 552 U.S. --- (2007), and Kimbrough v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 11:59 am
Dreeben’s first argument was in a case called United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 5:48 pm
United States, 179 F.3d 29, 35 (2nd Cir 1999). [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:57 am
A different case on the other side of the United States. . . [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
Pirker’s legal battle throws a spotlight on a commercial drone scene in the United States operating in a grey area. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 1:57 am
It was in the federal matter of United States v. [read post]
