Search for: "United States v. Nixon" Results 381 - 400 of 841
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2024, 3:06 am by jonathanturley
For example, Michael Waldman, president of New York University’s Brennan Center for Justice, noted that in 1974 the Court considered United States v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf pushes back against Justice Clarence Thomas’ originalist critique of the First Amendment overbreadth doctrine in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am by Marty Lederman
  To be sure, all United States persons, including citizens and taxpayers, have an interest in ensuring that the Executive complies with the law, and acts only when authorized to do so. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
United States that challenges to impeachment are non-justiciable. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 2:27 pm by Josh Blackman
United States held that Congress cannot strip the president’s absolute authority to fire officers who are subject to his control. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
”Once it was established that adults in the United States had the right to buy and use contraception, the attention shifted to access. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 6:36 am
Now, Judge Widener is taking Senior Status effective immediately.Judge Widener graduated from the US Naval Academy in 1944 and has served with distinction in the United States Navy. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
TrumpThis case was originally titled Tarla Makaeff et al v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 3:49 pm by Josh Fensterbush
Australia’s legal regime is similar to the United States in that there is a federal government and separate state/territory governments with their own autonomy. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 1:10 pm by NCC Staff
United States (1993), The Federalist Papers, and a Justice Department memo prove that not allowing witnesses in an impeachment trial would be unconstitutional. [read post]