Search for: "United States v. Provident National Bank" Results 381 - 400 of 2,034
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2017, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Jennifer Daskal explains why the court’s recent decision to review digital-privacy case United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks |  BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 4:03 am by asam90
’s Chapter 7 powers to maintain international peace and security and the proper exercise of an organ’s functions (United Nations, Charter of the United Nations, 1945, 1 UNTS XVI). [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:55 am by Eleanor Runde
Last month, the United Kingdom rejected a proposal to unilaterally seize frozen Russian state assets currently held in British banks. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 11:49 am by Elena Chachko
The United States currently has more than 35 national emergencies in force—all triggering the broad IEEPA sanctions authorities. [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
That agency is the Federal Reserve, the central bank of the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 6:38 am
Ct. 1559 (2007), in which the Court held that the National Banking Act preempted states' laws banning "predatory lending" by state-chartered banks that were subsidiaries of banks with national charters. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:18 am by Karen Gullo
For the brief:https://www.eff.org/document/eff-petition-graham-v-us For more on these cases:https://www.eff.org/cases/united-states-v-graham Contact:  JenniferLynchSenior Staff Attorneyjlynch@eff.org AndrewCrockerStaff Attorneyandrew@eff.org Share this: Join EFF [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 1:52 pm
Early post-Buckley decisions, most notably the forerunner to Citizens United, First National Bank of Boston v. [read post]
Arab Bank, the Supreme Court stated that the purpose of this law was to “promote harmony in international relations by ensuring foreign plaintiffs a remedy for international-law violations in circumstances where the absence of such a remedy might provoke foreign nations to hold the United States accountable. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
However, suppose Thomas Jefferson had been a foreign national that came to the U.S. from the United Kingdom a few years ago as a nonimmigrant in H-1B status to work as a banking and finance lawyer for a Virginia law firm. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 8:01 am by Margaret Sachs
    Why not allow these investors to sue in United States courts? [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 7:04 am by David Lake
As a result, the early United States was not able to provide adequate defense against the Indian tribes to the West and Europeans in the East. [read post]