Search for: "United States v. Railroad Company" Results 381 - 400 of 464
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2010, 12:11 pm by Andrew Frisch
Because Morris involved transportation of goods not passengers, the Third Circuit looked at cases arising in other contexts that defined interstate transportation of passengers, including United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm by Bexis
Challoner, 423 U.S. 3 (1975), that when a federal court is making a prediction of state law under Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 12:21 pm
Ct. 1640 (2010) (Apr. 21, 2010), the United States Supreme Court held that a plan adminstrator’s discretionary authority to interpret a plan is entitled to deference, even if a prior determination with regard to the same claim was invalid.Estate planning with retirement assetsArnstein & LehrFor many individuals, retirement benefits represent a significant portion of their wealth.Second Circuit finds that class arbitration waiver clause is unconscionable, refuses to compel… [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 8:30 pm by Deepak Gupta
In fact, then commerce secretary Herbert Hoover said during a Senate hearing, quote, "if the objection appears to be inclusion of workers' contracts in the law's scheme, it might well be amended by states but nothing herein contained shall apply to the contracts of seamen, railroad employees or any other class of workers engaged in interstate commerce. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 5:30 am
Barney, 129 U.S. 677, 682 (1889), and maintained in United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:28 am by Erin Miller
United States No. 08-1322, Astrue v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 3:46 pm by Anna Christensen
Regal-Beloit Corp.; Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 8:04 am by Erin Miller
Opinion below (2d Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition of the United States Brief in opposition of respondents Thompson et al. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 3:42 am by Sean Wajert
Plaintiffs were a class of local property owners who filed a complaint in Wisconsin state court against Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:37 pm by Adam Thierer
A wrap-up essay will then focus on some potentially constructive policy reforms that could assist media enterprises without a massive infusion of state support or regulation of the press. [read post]