Search for: "United States v. Richmond"
Results 381 - 400
of 562
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
On the issue of justiciability of the claim based on infringement of United States copyright, the Court had this to say: "87. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
The case of the day is Richmond Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm
After the case was filed in 2001, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California certified the class in 2004. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:41 am
United States, 431 U. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:34 am
Dukes (June 20, 2011) was released this morning by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 1:18 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit recently affirmed a bankruptcy court’s order revoking the discharge of Bruce E. [read post]
10 May 2011, 8:37 am
A courtroom in Richmond, Va., will be the site of a church-state showdown on Thursday. [read post]
6 May 2011, 7:22 am
Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal will argue on behalf of the United States in Richmond. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 11:58 pm
Similarly, in United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 8:25 am
The style of the case is, Windsor Village, Ltd. and Jackob Elbaz v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 12:47 pm
Not in Farrey v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:43 am
Filed 3/29/11 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE JSM TUSCANY, LLC et al., Petitioners, v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 10:51 am
Given that Congress created the FCA’s qui tam right to bring suit in the name of the United States, Congress certainly could add conditions to safeguard the interests of the United States. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:25 am
United States, a sentencing case to be argued in April; Berman worked with Stephanos Bibas, who was appointed to brief and argue the case as an amicus in support of the judgment below, on the case. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 10:12 am
Although the state of Virginia has a constitutional case on the new law already pending at the Supreme Court (Virginia v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 6:23 am
United States. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:25 am
Sweet begins with an introduction to City of Richmond v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:10 pm
However, as currently practiced by the Supreme Court of the United States, the tiered scrutiny formulation of substantive due process is illusory. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 2:34 pm
You should consult with your Virginia family law lawyer or Richmond divorce lawyer James H. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 3:00 am
While a detailed doctrinal analysis to support this assertion would be more appropriate for another venue, a careful review of the Court's severability reasoning in United States v. [read post]
