Search for: "United States v. Silvers" Results 381 - 400 of 557
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2017, 10:27 am by Molly Runkle
Addressing the first accusation, Maynard argued that the Sisters’ prophesying activity was protected by the First Amendment. (11th century Scottish law here looks remarkably similar to that of the 21st century United States.) [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
Also in June last year, the United Nations Human Rights Council unanimously approved a parallel project “[r]equest[ing] the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to continue the work on domestic law remedies to address corporate involvement in gross human rights abuses, and to organize consultations with experts, States and other relevant stakeholders”. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:24 pm by Pierre T. Nguyen
., United States Patent and Trademark Office). [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 8:48 pm
However, LEED and Green Globes are the most common in the United States. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
 The Strasbourg Observers blog has a post about the Court of Human Rights’ admissibility decision in the case of Tamiz v United Kingdom. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm by Dennis Crouch
”) Post Grant Admin: Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 5:06 pm
Where does irradiation of food fit into this evolving continuum including the new rule in the United States for lettuce and spinach? [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 5:06 pm
Where does irradiation of food fit into this evolving continuum including the new rule in the United States for lettuce and spinach? [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
In September 2007, the Ohio School Facilities Commission adopted its Green Schools Initiative, one of the most aggressive green building programs in the United States. [read post]
19 Jan 2019, 8:13 am by Florian Mueller
It's a rather iPhone-centric perspective, but the biggest problem here for Qualcomm is that Judge Koh ruled in GPNE Corp. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 6:43 am by Juan C. Antúnez
It does not purport to be a disclaimer, it was not acknowledged before “a judge, clerk, or deputy clerk of any court; a United States commissioner or magistrate; or any notary public or civil-law notary of this state,” and it was not recorded. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: US CAFC affirms that patent ownership (and standing) can vest through operation of law: Sky Technologies v SAP AG (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Property, intangible) US CAFC grants en banc request to challenge written description requirement: Ariad v Lilly (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) (Washington… [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 10:54 am by Stuart Kaplow
It has also been ranked by Forbes as the 10th richest in the United States and accordingly first construction costs do not have major economic implications. [read post]
Meanwhile, under California’s common law, imitating another person’s voice can violate that person’s right of publicity, as seen in the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Midler v. [read post]