Search for: "United States v. Standard Oil Company"
Results 381 - 400
of 553
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2011, 10:11 am
Esso Standard Oil Co. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 6:00 am
Exxon Shipping Company v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:20 pm
In American Electric Power Co., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:59 am
Here, the panel did find a violation because under (i) “the vast majority of cigarettes that were imported from Indonesia into the United States were clove cigarettes” (7.275); before the ban only one US company produced cloves, whereas many US producers sell (permitted) menthols. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/SU6 United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
The court held that the district court correctly determined that the ordinance should not be analyzed under the standards of Loretto v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:36 am
Drake meets Marcellus: a review of Pennsylvania case law upon the sesquicentennial of the United States oil and gas industry. 6 Tex. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 9:28 pm
Coal & Oil Co., 312 U.S. 270, 273 (1941)). [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 6:51 pm
The Plaintiffs sued Occidental (among the largest oil and gas companies in the U.S.) for environmental damage arising from alleged use of out-of-date methods for separating crude oil that contravened United States and Peruvian law, which allegedly resulted in millions of gallons of toxic oil byproducts in waterways. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am
The origins of forum non conveniens In 1947 the Supreme Court decided Gulf Oil Corp. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am
The origins of forum non conveniens In 1947 the Supreme Court decided Gulf Oil Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 3:16 pm
This standard reflects the supreme court's determination that courts should not undertake [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 9:48 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Research indicates that the decision in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Research indicates that the decision in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:01 am
The reasoning being that standard-form contracts are signed by consumers who have no right to negotiate its terms. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
Activ8-3D (EPLAW) EWPCC deals with unregistered designs: Access plus inspiration need not mean copying: Albert Packaging v Nampak (Class 99) (IPKat) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform Update: Will the House pass America Invents Act? [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:10 am
United States, the Court had the opportunity to clarify the Armed Career Criminal Act (the “ACCA”), the federal government’s version of a “three strikes” law. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am
In order to take stock of the degree of reflexivity, the paper examines the direction investment law is taking in a few key areas: first, in the shift in emphasis away from expropriations (the ‘takings rule’) to the fair and equitable treatment standard, which is performing similar functions; second, in the attempt to merge global standards by embracing World Trade Organization Appellate Body decision making; and third, the hesitant embrace of proportionality doctrine as a… [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am
In order to take stock of the degree of reflexivity, the paper examines the direction investment law is taking in a few key areas: first, in the shift in emphasis away from expropriations (the ‘takings rule’) to the fair and equitable treatment standard, which is performing similar functions; second, in the attempt to merge global standards by embracing World Trade Organization Appellate Body decision making; and third, the hesitant embrace of proportionality doctrine… [read post]
