Search for: "United States v. Stanley"
Results 381 - 400
of 549
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2011, 6:15 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2010 WL 6568293 (W.D. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 7:00 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 10:51 am
Given that Congress created the FCA’s qui tam right to bring suit in the name of the United States, Congress certainly could add conditions to safeguard the interests of the United States. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 4:06 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 8:58 pm
In People v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:17 pm
On March 4, 2011, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California approved a Class Action Settlement in In Re Countrywide Financial Corporation Securities Litigation, No. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 3:47 pm
Cir. 1996) ("The nonobviousness of the accused device, evidenced by the grant of a United States patent, is relevant to the issue of whether the change therein is substantial. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 12:02 pm
Two things sent the legal technology industry into a frenzy.First, the Victor Stanley v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am
However, this principle is not unlimited (see Cullen v Stanley [1926] IR 73 (SC); though quaere whether the case would be decided on its facts in the same way in the light of Quinlavan v O’Dea and Allister v Paisley above). [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 4:08 am
” In United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 2:58 pm
Supreme Court case and it is an important term discussed, written about, and fought over in Federal and State Courts every day across the United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 11:16 am
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/02/02/10-10009.pdf United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 4:30 am
A few weeks ago, we commented upon the recent Florida case of Farias v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 4:30 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 9:34 am
ACLU v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 2:13 pm
Thompson Co. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:30 am
The Court distinguished the facts of Farias from a previous case, Stanley Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 8:02 pm
Means of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas -- whose previous stay order I discussed in the post just linked -- has now extended his stay to all further proceedings in the federal lawsuit filed against Bishop Iker, pending resolution of the proceedings in State court. [read post]
