Search for: "United States v. Torres"
Results 381 - 400
of 422
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2011, 10:45 pm
State v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 7:06 pm
En noviembre, fue asesinada María del Carmen Vázquez, madre buscadora, en Abasolo, Guanajuato. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
It is very rarely permitted, since the American system of justice is premised upon an open system in which, whenever one side wants to communicate with the Court, it has to give prior notice to the other side, so that they too will have an opportunity to be heard.).The "ex parte" order would give the RIAA permission to take "immediate discovery" -- before the defendants have been served or given notice -- which authorizes the issuance of subpoenas to the ISP's asking for the… [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 5:13 am
United States, 879 F.2d 975, 982 (1st Cir. 1989); López-Torres v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:13 am
” Lluch v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:25 am
Board of Education: the idea is that the Supreme Court supported Brown because it served the United States’ cold war agenda of supporting human rights. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
” (This latter point becomes the focus of my later essay on A Mantra in Search of Meaning, also published as part of a symposium, this one at the University of North Carolina Law School celebrating the 40th anniversary of Baker v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
It is also ultra vires under well-established law.The seminal case applying the municipal cost recovery rule (sometimes also called the "free public services doctrine") is a sixty-year old Supreme Court case called United States v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:19 pm
State deficiencies in climate litigations and actions of judges Laurent Fonbaustier / Renaud Braillet 165 Part IV: Cities, States and Climate Change: Between Competition, Conflict and Cooperation Global climate governance turning translocal Delphine Misonne 181 America’s Climate Change Policy: Federalism in Action Daniel Esty 193 Local policies on climate change in a centralized State: The Example of France Camille… [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 5:15 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 9:17 pm
Rather that conceptualizing fairness in relation to States (developed v. developing), should we ask what international law can do to protect – or more importantly perhaps – to empower vulnerable communities? [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 1:39 pm
In previous crypto cases brought by the SEC, the agency has applied the Supreme Court’s investment contract formulation from SEC v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 2:15 pm
We have recorded 2,403 communities using identity disclosure versus 2,196 reverse sting operations in cities and counties across the United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 3:27 pm
Its more than 2,700 members practice throughout the United States, Canada and other foreign countries. [read post]
10 May 2019, 4:35 am
Erick V. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
State of Tennessee, No. 06-6208 In civil rights suit alleging that city police discriminated against plaintiffs in violation of the Ame [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:30 am
[Rome] : Food And Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2011.S494.5.A43 C5 2011International LawInter-American cooperation at a crossroads / edited by Gordon Mace, Andrew F. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:11 am
It also highlights and partially explores the difference in the United States and Australian copyright laws with a few case studies of legal issues surrounding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander artworks in Australia. [read post]
16 Jun 2025, 9:05 pm
A 2024 survey found that a majority of registered voters believe the United States had taken the wrong approach toward crypto regulation and that the SEC was heavy-handed, with two-thirds of voters responding that the SEC should wait for Congress to provide clearer guidelines. [read post]
