Search for: "United States v. Various Articles of Device"
Results 381 - 400
of 494
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
By itself, a single magazine article would be nothing of special note. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
This equipment, known as exhaust after-treatment devices (ATDs), controls engine exhaust emissions once the emissions have exited the engine and entered the exhaust system. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 11:12 pm
‘The Supreme Court decision in eBay v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 7:54 am
In Section 2202, the PRA provides that the United States owns “Presidential records. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
More pointedly, it provides (in §606(c)) that: Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order to preserve the neutrality of the United States, the President, if he deems it necessary in the interest of national security or defense, may suspend or amend, for such time as he may see fit, the rules and regulations applicable to any or all stations or… [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 7:28 am
(citing Wilson v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
It's well known the code is buggy; that's why software updates for anything from apps to operating systems are now the norm. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
As long as the breath sample has been preserved, one can always go back and retest it on a different device. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 8:01 am
State v. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm
The Society of Editors had an article. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am
” Within that statutory framework, a “moped” was defined as “[a] vehicle that has two or three wheels, no external shifting device, and a motor that does not exceed 50 cubic centimeters piston displacement and cannot propel the vehicle at a speed greater than 30 miles per hour on a level surface. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:21 pm
Other legislation to prevent intellectual property theft was also introduced including the Deter Cyber Theft Act, which aims to block products that contain intellectual property stolen from U.S. companies by foreign countries from being sold in the United States. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism… [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
(FamC (Jer) 22317-08-11 M.V. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 1:25 am
I plan to attend the appellate hearing, which I guess will take place in a couple of months.UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION OF THE KEY PASSAGES OF THE DECISION (with my explanations in [brackets]):In NetDoktor.de v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm
Part I: SLAPPS – A Weapon Against Public Participation During the 1970s SLAPPs were recognized for the first time as a legal phenomenon in the United States. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 12:45 pm
United States (466 U.S. 170, 182-83 (1984)) may also be difficult. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm
In an article in the Harvard Business Law Review, Howell E. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:47 pm
The court observed that even the articles upon which the plaintiffs' expert relied specifically noted that ADRs could not be used to calculate the relative frequency of adverse reactions. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 3:30 am
On Monday, December 13, 2010, the United States Supreme Court issued a non-decision in the matter of Costco Wholesale Corporation v. [read post]
