Search for: "W. Golden" Results 381 - 400 of 611
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2010, 12:55 pm by Frank Pasquale
Consequently, the Golden Projects enjoyed priority funding. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 1:46 pm by WSLL
Golden filed a dissenting opinion in which J. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 1:10 pm
The Board adopted the administrative law judge's finding that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(3) and (1) of the Act by failing and refusing to hire applicants David W. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 10:45 am by Ron Coleman
  I was reminded of this post, however, first because of a recent representation inquiry concerning a comic book character, and secondly because of a post by her IP Mavenship Pamela Chestek, entitled, “The Exemplar Case For Why Joint Trademark Ownership is Bad,” which begins as follows: According to McCarthy, “[w]hen there is a dispute over who owns a trademark, the worst possible solution is to allow mark ownership to be shared among the warring parties. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 12:51 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  Would their billionaire benefactors be displeased if they were now to pass up this golden opportunity to leave their gold untaxed? [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 4:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
Henson reacts after winning Best Actress — TV Series, Drama for her performance in “Empire” at the 73rd Golden Globe Awards in Beverly Hills, Calif., on Jan. 10. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 7:05 am by Neil H. Buchanan
 And do not forget that I am quoting from the source that Fwill himself cited in support of his BS assertion that the Fed’s primary purpose is to prevent inflation.This is all in part merely a bad imitation of Democratic Senator William Proxmire's silly "Golden Fleece Awards" from the 1970's (which I explain at the end of this column), where uninformed critics take anti-intellectual potshots at government research activities that rankle them. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 9:09 pm
" He wondered if George W's own Group W Bench could pass its own moral fitness tests to join in the escapades they orchestrated.Orin Kerr from Volokh grabbed my attention to pull me back into the center of the room, after seeing me talking to an empty bench in the corner. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 2:12 am
 A4310C Budget -- Enacts into law major components of legislation necessary to implement the revenue budget for the 2007-2008 state fiscal plan BLURB : ART VII; revenue Last Act: 04/01/07 substituted by s2110c04/01/07 DELIVERED TO GOVERNOR LAW / CRIM-PROCA7197 Lavine -- Permits waiver of indictment for class A felonies which are not punishable by death or life imprisonment BLURB : CP L. waiver of indictment Last Act: 04/04/07 referred to… [read post]
3 May 2019, 8:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Online reviews. % of sales w/product design features. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm by Marie Louise
(Docket Report) District Court W D Tennessee: Twombly and Iqbal, not Form 18, dictate pleading standard for indirect infringement: Asentinel LLC v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:22 pm by Dennis Crouch
By Dennis Crouch A group of sixty US intellectual property law professors have signed a letter to Congress supporting anti-troll patent reform legislation. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:15 am by Aaron Moss
A new crop of copyrighted works (including rights in a certain famous British detective) will enter the public domain in the United States on January 1, 2023. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
(Docket Report) District Court W D Wisconsin: Motion to stay pending the Federal Circuit’s decision denied in false marking case: Hy Cite Corporation v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
(GRAY on Claims) District Court E D Texas finds Applied Medical Resources liable for infringement of Covidien’s surgical device patent (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas limits number of patent claims and prior art references asserted in case: SynQor, Inc v Artesyn Technologies, Inc et al (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Non-practising entity entitled to permanent injunction where infringed patent was the subject of prior exclusive license: Judkins v. [read post]